Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Right, more analysis of the ION foundation science degree info brochure, as promised. In the first year, students “will study ION’s method of analysing a client’s health status via a comprehensive health questionnaire” (p. 7). One would really hope that the techniques they learn are better than those in this questionnaire. Maybe the ION’s teaching of questionnaires is along the lines of - do as we say, not as we do.

In year 2, students learn how “Tests, when used appropriately and interpreted correctly alongside other client information, are a valuable diagnostic tool for nutritional
therapists.” (p.7) Yes, (some) tests can be valuable, when correctly interpreted. However, organisations linked to ION have recommended that I get a somewhat peculiar range of tests based on an online questionnaire, and based on the Brain Bio Centre’s incorrect belief that dyspraxia is associated with low intelligence. Aside from recommending, um, unusual tests, Holford also supports the use of IgG tests to diagnose food intolerances - which they cannot do reliably.

Students therefore need to hope that - while some people and institutions linked to the ION do not always design questionnaires well and sometimes recommend unnecessary and/or ineffective tests - the ION will be able to educate them effectively on these subjects. Would you be confident that a Foundation Degree in science from the ION really does offer solid foundations?

Anyway, that’s still only got me to p.7 of a 25 page course brochure. It’s sunny outside, so that’s enough blogging for today. At this rate, I might get through the information brochure this month, if I’m lucky. Sorry if this is boring people - sure I’ll find other things to write about, too.