Currying for business? Holford denies his competing interests in BMJ rapid response

I’ve previously blogged about Holford’s rapid response on the BMJ website failing to declare his ‘competing interests’. David Colquhoun responds to Holford, arguing that Holford “[b]eing the sole shareholder in Health Products for Life might be thought of by the sceptical as constituting a rather large financial interest in promotion of nutritional supplements”.

Rather than apologising, though, Holford has submitted a second rapid response which argues that “I was pointing out that the scientific data for turmeric – found in curry – having a beneficial effect was substantial…Since I don’t run an Indian restaurant I didn’t feel there were any conflicts involved in recommending curry.”

Sounds fair enough. Well, it would be, except Holford’s HealthProductsForLife sells curcumin (turmeric extract) supplements. Holford’s initial rapid response stated that “1834 studies are cited in PubMed on turmeric or curcumin, thought to be the active ingredient in this spice, many of which demonstrate clear anti-inflammatory and immune enhancing properties, 648 of which relate specifically, and consistently, to it’s anti-cancer properties.” HealthProductsForLife therefore sells the product which Holford claims has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, immune-enhancing and anti-cancer properties’. Sounds like a competing interest to me.

One more thing to note – Holford also attacks Prof Colquhoun, arguing that Colquhoun “has so far not felt it relevant to mention his own competing interests and financial involvements with the pharmaceutical industry”. Now, this might lead one to believe that Colquhoun is hiding his interests in the evil pharmaceutical industry – in order to have a go at a poor nutritionist. However, Colquhoun didn’t declare any competing interests because, um, he doesn’t have any (unlike Holford). Colquhoun’s “research has never been funded by the drug industry, but always by the Medical Research Council or by the Wellcome Trust“. Oops.

Advertisement

6 Comments

Filed under bmj, competing interests, curcumin, David Colquhoun, health products for life, patrick holford, rapid response, tumeric

6 Responses to Currying for business? Holford denies his competing interests in BMJ rapid response

  1. Shinga

    You’re really not up on your irregular verb theory are you?

    I am a leading edge researcher and provider of quality advice to the public.

    You have a conflict of interest.

    He/she is a pharma shill.

    Must stop damaging my brain with this stuff.

    Regards – Shinga

  2. Pingback: Patrick Holford and Chineham Primary School: Where does the praise belong? « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

  3. Pingback: Patrick Holford Refers to Someone Else as Inaccurate « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

  4. Pingback: Patrick Holford, Dr Richard Halvorsen and The Vaccination Schedule As a Risk for Asthma « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

  5. Pingback: Curry can cure cancer, say scientists « Stuff And Nonsense

  6. Pingback: The BMJ: Rabid Responses and Competing Interests « Stuff And Nonsense

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s