<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Relevant Are Holford&#8217;s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nutritionism Industry &#171; Stuff And Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-35271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Nutritionism Industry &#171; Stuff And Nonsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/#comment-35271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read all of his books, but I can tell you that his H Factor book on homocysteine (more here) contains not only an advert for YorkTest, but also a directory of supplement [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read all of his books, but I can tell you that his H Factor book on homocysteine (more here) contains not only an advert for YorkTest, but also a directory of supplement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford Promotes His Apocryphal Homocysteine Gospel in The News of the World &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford Promotes His Apocryphal Homocysteine Gospel in The News of the World &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/#comment-17219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or Hoax Asks Patrick Holford How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 1 How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 Patrick Holford, Alzheimer’s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements  Polypills or Vitamins [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or Hoax Asks Patrick Holford How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 1 How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 Patrick Holford, Alzheimer’s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements  Polypills or Vitamins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homocysteine: Really Not a Crystal Ball &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homocysteine: Really Not a Crystal Ball &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/#comment-11556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or Hoax Asks Patrick Holford How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 1 How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 Patrick Holford, Alzheimer’s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements  Polypills or Vitamins [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or Hoax Asks Patrick Holford How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 1 How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 Patrick Holford, Alzheimer’s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements  Polypills or Vitamins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polypills or Vitamins for Homocysteine and Cardiovascular Risks: the Hype is Ahead of the Evidence &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polypills or Vitamins for Homocysteine and Cardiovascular Risks: the Hype is Ahead of the Evidence &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/#comment-9636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or Hoax Asks Patrick Holford How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 1 How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 Patrick Holford, Alzheimer’s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements  Gene Sherpa on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or Hoax Asks Patrick Holford How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 1 How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 Patrick Holford, Alzheimer’s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements  Gene Sherpa on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford, Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford, Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease, Homocysteine Tests and Supplements &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/how-relevant-are-holfords-claims-about-homocysteine-levels-part-2/#comment-4815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Relevant Are Holford’s Claims About Homocysteine Levels? Part 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

