<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Holfordism Harmless? Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-17735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-17735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were told that ION is not open to FOI because it is a private institution - also, course materials tend to be concealed under &#039;protection of property&#039; weaselling.

As far as we know, nobody has yet gone on to take the full BSc so it is difficult to know what sort of state of preparedness the students are in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were told that ION is not open to FOI because it is a private institution &#8211; also, course materials tend to be concealed under &#8216;protection of property&#8217; weaselling.</p>
<p>As far as we know, nobody has yet gone on to take the full BSc so it is difficult to know what sort of state of preparedness the students are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mole</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-17450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-17450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re Nutritional Sciences BSc Hons (Level 3 only)

Has anyone put in an FOI request for the quality documentation for this course or the foundation degree that precedes it? It would be very interesting to examine the learning objectives and course content in detail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Nutritional Sciences BSc Hons (Level 3 only)</p>
<p>Has anyone put in an FOI request for the quality documentation for this course or the foundation degree that precedes it? It would be very interesting to examine the learning objectives and course content in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford Has What He Calls A Blog &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-14550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford Has What He Calls A Blog &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-14550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] continue with this farrago of quintessential Holfordism. It might be said that the Government, the pharmaceutical companies and the science lobby groups [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continue with this farrago of quintessential Holfordism. It might be said that the Government, the pharmaceutical companies and the science lobby groups [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gimpy</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-7002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gimpy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-7002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Superburgermuncher, you said&lt;blockquote&gt;No doubt you are going to disregard my experience in clinic and tell me these supplements are of no use.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is an interesting argument to make.  It assumes that your personal, subjective, experience trumps objective peer-reviewed papers and DBRCT trials.  That is an argument beloved by homeopaths and frequently used to justify a scientifically untenable position.  
But anyway, I am curious as to how you diagnose gut permeability, low gastric juice secretion or the inadequate breakdown of proteins?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superburgermuncher, you said<br />
<blockquote>No doubt you are going to disregard my experience in clinic and tell me these supplements are of no use.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is an interesting argument to make.  It assumes that your personal, subjective, experience trumps objective peer-reviewed papers and DBRCT trials.  That is an argument beloved by homeopaths and frequently used to justify a scientifically untenable position.<br />
But anyway, I am curious as to how you diagnose gut permeability, low gastric juice secretion or the inadequate breakdown of proteins?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superburgermuncher</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-6992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superburgermuncher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-6992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blimey, you have seemed to have written a blog without sounding arrogant. Well done.

It is however my opinion that doctors do not hand out good advice when concerning diabetes.

Interseting about multivits and mins. This is one supplement i do not advise very often. I have come across many examples where they make people feel worse. The symptoms i have recorded seem to be dizziness, fuzzyness and muscle aches.

I dont bother with intolerance testing . It is more important in my experience that the integrety of the gut wall is improved. Gut permeabilty seems to be more of a problem.
low gastric juice secretion also seems to play a big part. Many people who i see are not breaking down proteins properly. Betaine HCL supplentation, avoiding stress and glutamine use seems to help many.

No doubt you are going to disregard my experience in clinic and tell me these supplements are of no use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey, you have seemed to have written a blog without sounding arrogant. Well done.</p>
<p>It is however my opinion that doctors do not hand out good advice when concerning diabetes.</p>
<p>Interseting about multivits and mins. This is one supplement i do not advise very often. I have come across many examples where they make people feel worse. The symptoms i have recorded seem to be dizziness, fuzzyness and muscle aches.</p>
<p>I dont bother with intolerance testing . It is more important in my experience that the integrety of the gut wall is improved. Gut permeabilty seems to be more of a problem.<br />
low gastric juice secretion also seems to play a big part. Many people who i see are not breaking down proteins properly. Betaine HCL supplentation, avoiding stress and glutamine use seems to help many.</p>
<p>No doubt you are going to disregard my experience in clinic and tell me these supplements are of no use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-6945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-6945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SBM - as a matter of interest, do you advise your clients that IgG blood tests are of any relevance in the diagnosis of food intolerance? If you do, which papers do you rely upon for your evidence and why would you prefer that interpretation over that of the evidence given here, or by Dr Glenis Scadding to the House of Lords, or the summary of evidence produced by the ASA in finding that there was no evidence to support the use of IgG tests in such a way.

I am curious because so many ION graduates offer IgG testing etc. for the diagnosis of food intolerance. Similarly, although there is no indication that they have any relevance outside very specific heavy metal exposures, a number of ION Diplomates offer hair mineral testing and I see that it is part of the curriculum along with other similar oddities.

A propos your suggestion about ION being the way forward, I&#039;ve never been one for the faute de mieux argument. I think that there are substantially better methods that might be integrated into the general education system. Similarly, I will be interested in the assessment of the Superhealth GP practices that involve doctors rooms, gyms, pools, kitchens, teaching facilities etc.

As for the diabetes, hmm. It is not my experience so much that doctors and dietitians have any difficulty informing people about the benefits of the Portfolio or Mediterranean Diet but they do have difficulty in persuading people to follow it. Might I suggest that the people who have difficulty following these tremendously useful dietary recommendations are not the ones who pay to see a nutritionist, privately?

I, too, know a considerable number of people with Type II Diabetes who do control it by following their doctor&#039;s dietary recommendations and take no medication at all. I could estimate these numbers, however, so they are a far cry from your &lt;b&gt;countless&lt;/b&gt;, although, I would have thought you kept client records that would enable you to make such an estimate. 

Supplements have a place for the people who need them. One of my niggling concerns is that unless people obtain the supplements from a reputable source (e.g., the sort of supplements used by the NHS and possibly supplied on an FP10) then it is only too feasible for people not to be entirely sure what they are taking (accurate dosages or possible contaminants - ConsumerLab in the US has written up some eye-opening findings in this area).

Beyond that, I do have difficulty with the notion that supplements can be promoted as if their efficacy for a general population is clinically proven. E.g., for all the posturing about cinnamon, the studies that have been done are almost all on people with established blood sugar derangements. You will be aware of the recent paper that showed a suprising number of worse health outcomes for people who take (typically) a multivitamin and mineral supplement. The reasons as to why this might be subsequently confirmed or not are fascinating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBM &#8211; as a matter of interest, do you advise your clients that IgG blood tests are of any relevance in the diagnosis of food intolerance? If you do, which papers do you rely upon for your evidence and why would you prefer that interpretation over that of the evidence given here, or by Dr Glenis Scadding to the House of Lords, or the summary of evidence produced by the ASA in finding that there was no evidence to support the use of IgG tests in such a way.</p>
<p>I am curious because so many ION graduates offer IgG testing etc. for the diagnosis of food intolerance. Similarly, although there is no indication that they have any relevance outside very specific heavy metal exposures, a number of ION Diplomates offer hair mineral testing and I see that it is part of the curriculum along with other similar oddities.</p>
<p>A propos your suggestion about ION being the way forward, I&#8217;ve never been one for the faute de mieux argument. I think that there are substantially better methods that might be integrated into the general education system. Similarly, I will be interested in the assessment of the Superhealth GP practices that involve doctors rooms, gyms, pools, kitchens, teaching facilities etc.</p>
<p>As for the diabetes, hmm. It is not my experience so much that doctors and dietitians have any difficulty informing people about the benefits of the Portfolio or Mediterranean Diet but they do have difficulty in persuading people to follow it. Might I suggest that the people who have difficulty following these tremendously useful dietary recommendations are not the ones who pay to see a nutritionist, privately?</p>
<p>I, too, know a considerable number of people with Type II Diabetes who do control it by following their doctor&#8217;s dietary recommendations and take no medication at all. I could estimate these numbers, however, so they are a far cry from your <b>countless</b>, although, I would have thought you kept client records that would enable you to make such an estimate. </p>
<p>Supplements have a place for the people who need them. One of my niggling concerns is that unless people obtain the supplements from a reputable source (e.g., the sort of supplements used by the NHS and possibly supplied on an FP10) then it is only too feasible for people not to be entirely sure what they are taking (accurate dosages or possible contaminants &#8211; ConsumerLab in the US has written up some eye-opening findings in this area).</p>
<p>Beyond that, I do have difficulty with the notion that supplements can be promoted as if their efficacy for a general population is clinically proven. E.g., for all the posturing about cinnamon, the studies that have been done are almost all on people with established blood sugar derangements. You will be aware of the recent paper that showed a suprising number of worse health outcomes for people who take (typically) a multivitamin and mineral supplement. The reasons as to why this might be subsequently confirmed or not are fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeT</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-6942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LeeT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-6942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony

Unfortunately, the NTC do not seem to want to do much regulating at the current time:
http://www.nutritionaltherapycouncil.org.uk/complaint.htm

Hopefully, 2008 will see more news as to how our £900,000 has been spent
http://www.bant.org.uk/bant/pdf/AN_UPDATE_FROM_NTC_%20Dec_2005.doc

Superburgermuncher 

It is interesting that several Dip IONs have come on here to disassociate themselves from Patrick Holford.   Certainly, no sensible person would disagree with the idea of optimum nutrition.  Although, the Dip ION may be hard work it is still only a Foundation Degree.  Would you agree it would be a good idea if all nutrition therapists did the full honours degree? Perhaps the ION could work more closely with dietitians?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the NTC do not seem to want to do much regulating at the current time:<br />
<a href="http://www.nutritionaltherapycouncil.org.uk/complaint.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nutritionaltherapycouncil.org.uk/complaint.htm</a></p>
<p>Hopefully, 2008 will see more news as to how our £900,000 has been spent<br />
<a href="http://www.bant.org.uk/bant/pdf/AN_UPDATE_FROM_NTC_%20Dec_2005.doc" rel="nofollow">http://www.bant.org.uk/bant/pdf/AN_UPDATE_FROM_NTC_%20Dec_2005.doc</a></p>
<p>Superburgermuncher </p>
<p>It is interesting that several Dip IONs have come on here to disassociate themselves from Patrick Holford.   Certainly, no sensible person would disagree with the idea of optimum nutrition.  Although, the Dip ION may be hard work it is still only a Foundation Degree.  Would you agree it would be a good idea if all nutrition therapists did the full honours degree? Perhaps the ION could work more closely with dietitians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superburgermuncher</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-6922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superburgermuncher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-6922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree with angelica.
There were many people on the ion course who were not capable.
Although you love to think as ion as a part time course, i probably put about 40 hours a week into it, which certainly isnt part time.
I think that is why lots of people drop out and are not capable at the end, because they are not 100% dedicated and do not put the work in.
I think one mistake you are making is that ion students just follow holfords research. This is not the case at all. I looked at every study before citing it and never took the word of a lecturer. Holford only gives two lectures in the three years i was there.
What ever the down falls of ion, surely it is obvious that this has to be the way forward when concerning health care.
I read here that you are concerened with supplements. Would that be multivits and mins or supplements in general?
The most common problem i deal with would be blood sugar problems. I have helped countless patients reverse type 2 diabetes (usually within 1 month), doctors and dieticians seem to struggle with this. What are your thoughts on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with angelica.<br />
There were many people on the ion course who were not capable.<br />
Although you love to think as ion as a part time course, i probably put about 40 hours a week into it, which certainly isnt part time.<br />
I think that is why lots of people drop out and are not capable at the end, because they are not 100% dedicated and do not put the work in.<br />
I think one mistake you are making is that ion students just follow holfords research. This is not the case at all. I looked at every study before citing it and never took the word of a lecturer. Holford only gives two lectures in the three years i was there.<br />
What ever the down falls of ion, surely it is obvious that this has to be the way forward when concerning health care.<br />
I read here that you are concerened with supplements. Would that be multivits and mins or supplements in general?<br />
The most common problem i deal with would be blood sugar problems. I have helped countless patients reverse type 2 diabetes (usually within 1 month), doctors and dieticians seem to struggle with this. What are your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nutritionists , London</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-6857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nutritionists , London]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-6857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s very nice of Catherine Collins to clear that up.

I thought that was the whole point of setting up the NTC to get some regulation of the Nutrition therapy industry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very nice of Catherine Collins to clear that up.</p>
<p>I thought that was the whole point of setting up the NTC to get some regulation of the Nutrition therapy industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonhw</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/comment-page-2/#comment-2663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonhw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/is-holfordism-harmless-part-1/#comment-2663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks - I was thinking of something like that.  Just need to work out details like how...and how much work it would take ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks &#8211; I was thinking of something like that.  Just need to work out details like how&#8230;and how much work it would take ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

