<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More MMR bad science: The Guardian, the BMJ, and Holford Watch in BMJ Rapid Responses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 in 58 Have Autism Redux: I Blame The Observer &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-9044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1 in 58 Have Autism Redux: I Blame The Observer &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/#comment-9044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of the team that is supposed to have uncovered this figure, has explained that that figure has no foundation. Prof. Baron-Cohen wote a letter to The Observer (amongst others) to correct that infamous 1 in 58 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the team that is supposed to have uncovered this figure, has explained that that figure has no foundation. Prof. Baron-Cohen wote a letter to The Observer (amongst others) to correct that infamous 1 in 58 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Response to the Observer and Autism &#171; Action For Autism</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Media Response to the Observer and Autism &#171; Action For Autism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] figures (the claim that 1 in 58 children is on the autistic spectrum) is even more disturbing. [read on ] In the aftermath of the Observer debacle, one of those described in the original piece as being an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] figures (the claim that 1 in 58 children is on the autistic spectrum) is even more disturbing. [read on ] In the aftermath of the Observer debacle, one of those described in the original piece as being an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was it ethical to film the Food for the Brainproject at Chineham Green School, and Broadcast this on Tonight with Trevor McDonald? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Was it ethical to film the Food for the Brainproject at Chineham Green School, and Broadcast this on Tonight with Trevor McDonald? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/#comment-368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Holford&#160;Myths        &#8592; More MMR bad science: The Guardian, the BMJ, and Holford Watch in BMJ Rapid&#160;Responses [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Holford&nbsp;Myths        &larr; More MMR bad science: The Guardian, the BMJ, and Holford Watch in BMJ Rapid&nbsp;Responses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinga</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/07/16/more-mmr-bad-science-the-guardian-the-bmj-and-holford-watch-in-bmj-rapid-responses/#comment-367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Orac says, &quot;The Stupid, it burns&quot;.

I do think that the BMJ propagating this canard is a new nadir in the story but it is too much to hope that it is the absolute nadir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Orac says, &#8220;The Stupid, it burns&#8221;.</p>
<p>I do think that the BMJ propagating this canard is a new nadir in the story but it is too much to hope that it is the absolute nadir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

