<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Observer editor is to go: we are more possible than they could powerfully imagine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 in 58 Have Autism Redux: I Blame The Observer &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-9046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1 in 58 Have Autism Redux: I Blame The Observer &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-9046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] though Observer Editor Roger Alton has had to stand down from his post, for matters relating to this fiasco, the Observer has not officially retracted that story or that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] though Observer Editor Roger Alton has had to stand down from his post, for matters relating to this fiasco, the Observer has not officially retracted that story or that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonhw</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonhw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for all the comments.  Claire, blogged the Scotsman piece &lt;a href=&quot;http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/01/the-scotsman-reproduces-a-standard-article-correcting-its-dr-holford-error-but-still-with-lots-of-dubious-claims&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the comments.  Claire, blogged the Scotsman piece <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/01/the-scotsman-reproduces-a-standard-article-correcting-its-dr-holford-error-but-still-with-lots-of-dubious-claims" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdc325</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdc325]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GMC press office here: http://www.gmcpressoffice.org.uk/apps/news/events/index.php?key=0 has details of forthcoming hearings and you can check on a doctor&#039;s status here: https://webcache.gmc-uk.org/ods/home.do

PS - the Nick Cohen piece is on CiF. Here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2200815,00.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GMC press office here: <a href="http://www.gmcpressoffice.org.uk/apps/news/events/index.php?key=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.gmcpressoffice.org.uk/apps/news/events/index.php?key=0</a> has details of forthcoming hearings and you can check on a doctor&#8217;s status here: <a href="https://webcache.gmc-uk.org/ods/home.do" rel="nofollow">https://webcache.gmc-uk.org/ods/home.do</a></p>
<p>PS &#8211; the Nick Cohen piece is on CiF. Here: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2200815,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2200815,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeT</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LeeT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have any idea when we will know of the outcome of Dr Andrew Wakefield&#039;s disciplinary hearing at the GMC?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have any idea when we will know of the outcome of Dr Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s disciplinary hearing at the GMC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stever</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hopefully there will be a change at the Observer following the MMR disgrace/debacle. Never nice to see heads role and i dont think Alton has been all bad by any stretch. But the MMR bollocks, and more specifically the fasilure to rertract apologise appropriately was inexcusable. 

There was a good Nick Cohen piece/debunk/critique of homeopathy and related politics in this weeks edition which maybe bodes well. Apparently he has been talking to some of our blogging colleagues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopefully there will be a change at the Observer following the MMR disgrace/debacle. Never nice to see heads role and i dont think Alton has been all bad by any stretch. But the MMR bollocks, and more specifically the fasilure to rertract apologise appropriately was inexcusable. </p>
<p>There was a good Nick Cohen piece/debunk/critique of homeopathy and related politics in this weeks edition which maybe bodes well. Apparently he has been talking to some of our blogging colleagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[apologies for diverting attention to another newspaper but have you seen this: http://living.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=1727272007  Guess who? featuring:

&quot;...RED ONIONS

THE ILLNESSES: asthma and eczema.

THE CONVENTIONAL MEDICINE: asthma and eczema are both inflammatory conditions that often occur due to unidentified allergies.

Inhalers delivering corticosteroid and beta-agonist drugs for asthma control the progression and symptoms of the illness.

Cortisone creams for eczema thin the skin, making you more vulnerable to infection.

• THE FOOD MEDICINE: quercetin is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory chemical found in red onions that may reduce allergic symptoms associated with asthma and eczema...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apologies for diverting attention to another newspaper but have you seen this: <a href="http://living.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=1727272007" rel="nofollow">http://living.scotsman.com/health.cfm?id=1727272007</a>  Guess who? featuring:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;RED ONIONS</p>
<p>THE ILLNESSES: asthma and eczema.</p>
<p>THE CONVENTIONAL MEDICINE: asthma and eczema are both inflammatory conditions that often occur due to unidentified allergies.</p>
<p>Inhalers delivering corticosteroid and beta-agonist drugs for asthma control the progression and symptoms of the illness.</p>
<p>Cortisone creams for eczema thin the skin, making you more vulnerable to infection.</p>
<p>• THE FOOD MEDICINE: quercetin is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory chemical found in red onions that may reduce allergic symptoms associated with asthma and eczema&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draust</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[draust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media pages seem to be suggesting that the &lt;i&gt;Observer&lt;/i&gt; may well ultimately end up being more or less &quot;the Sunday Guardian&quot;. Which might imply merging staffs. 

I wouldn&#039;t say the Guardian&#039;s science reporting is necessarily universally good, or even all that much better than the Observer. It is  just a bit more howler-free. Perhaps the Guardian are a little more circumspect about letting &quot;the news agenda&quot; (transl: the news editor&#039;s frantic desire to have a SCOOP to run)  override the facts or analysis... which is really what we were criticizing the Observer for.

The Observer&#039;s recent flailings are odd in some ways, as the quality Sundays were historically noted for prioritizing analysis and investigation over &quot;hot news&quot; - the point being that, sport aside, you couldn&#039;t reliably find too much new news on a Sunday that hadn&#039;t already been covered in the Saturdays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media pages seem to be suggesting that the <i>Observer</i> may well ultimately end up being more or less &#8220;the Sunday Guardian&#8221;. Which might imply merging staffs. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say the Guardian&#8217;s science reporting is necessarily universally good, or even all that much better than the Observer. It is  just a bit more howler-free. Perhaps the Guardian are a little more circumspect about letting &#8220;the news agenda&#8221; (transl: the news editor&#8217;s frantic desire to have a SCOOP to run)  override the facts or analysis&#8230; which is really what we were criticizing the Observer for.</p>
<p>The Observer&#8217;s recent flailings are odd in some ways, as the quality Sundays were historically noted for prioritizing analysis and investigation over &#8220;hot news&#8221; &#8211; the point being that, sport aside, you couldn&#8217;t reliably find too much new news on a Sunday that hadn&#8217;t already been covered in the Saturdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commius</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Commius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone think that a change in editor may lead to an improvement in the quality of reporting, or is that just wishful thinking?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone think that a change in editor may lead to an improvement in the quality of reporting, or is that just wishful thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/10/28/observer-editor-is-to-go-we-are-more-possible-than-they-could-powerfully-imagine/#comment-2848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogging is great!
It&#039;s a wonderful way of focusing attention and putting pressure on the media folk, when they try to pass bullshit off as news.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging is great!<br />
It&#8217;s a wonderful way of focusing attention and putting pressure on the media folk, when they try to pass bullshit off as news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

