<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrick Holford, Food for the Brain and Equazen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford and the Vitamins for Asthma That Become All About Food Intolerance and YorkTest &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-19006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford and the Vitamins for Asthma That Become All About Food Intolerance and YorkTest &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-19006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] even now, without any evidence to support those assertions, it would not be appropriate for either Holford or YorkTest to make those claims about the efficacy of York Test or asthma in an advertisement [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even now, without any evidence to support those assertions, it would not be appropriate for either Holford or YorkTest to make those claims about the efficacy of York Test or asthma in an advertisement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Advertising Standards Authority May Be Closing Some Loopholes: About Time &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-13389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Advertising Standards Authority May Be Closing Some Loopholes: About Time &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-13389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] advertising rules may change to close loophole.[a] We have blogged several ASA rulings that involve Patrick Holford and Equazen where the ASA has found that their advertising in untruthful, unsubstantiated etc. and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advertising rules may change to close loophole.[a] We have blogged several ASA rulings that involve Patrick Holford and Equazen where the ASA has found that their advertising in untruthful, unsubstantiated etc. and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Equazen and the ASA - Again &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-12522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Equazen and the ASA - Again &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-12522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] an interesting inversion, in Equazen&#8217;s previous contretemps with the ASA, they, like YorkTest before them, attempted to refute the challenges made to their claims by citing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting inversion, in Equazen&#8217;s previous contretemps with the ASA, they, like YorkTest before them, attempted to refute the challenges made to their claims by citing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-10696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-10696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John  - tolorate or not, you really are a bit of a tosser!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John  &#8211; tolorate or not, you really are a bit of a tosser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-10692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-10692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im not sure why i am getting involved with this blog, i think i need to lie down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im not sure why i am getting involved with this blog, i think i need to lie down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-10691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-10691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you could then say that complete belief in scientific evidence could well undermine anecdotal evidence. You have to look at both side of the coin Dvnutrix.

&lt;strong&gt;Admin edit: &quot;anecdotal evidence&quot; - oxymoron.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you could then say that complete belief in scientific evidence could well undermine anecdotal evidence. You have to look at both side of the coin Dvnutrix.</p>
<p><strong>Admin edit: &#8220;anecdotal evidence&#8221; &#8211; oxymoron.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-10690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-10690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=how-anecdotal-evidence-can-undermine-scientific-results&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How anecdotal evidence can undermine scientific results&lt;/a&gt;.

Nothing new but easy to read.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The reason for this cognitive disconnect is that we have evolved brains that pay attention to anecdotes because false positives (believing there is a connection between A and B when there is not) are usually harmless, whereas false negatives (believing there is no connection between A and B when there is) may take you out of the gene pool. Our brains are belief engines that employ association learning to seek and find patterns. Superstition and belief in magic are millions of years old, whereas science, with its methods of controlling for intervening variables to circumvent false positives, is only a few hundred years old. So it is that any medical huckster promising that A will cure B has only to advertise a handful of successful anecdotes in the form of testimonials.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=how-anecdotal-evidence-can-undermine-scientific-results" rel="nofollow">How anecdotal evidence can undermine scientific results</a>.</p>
<p>Nothing new but easy to read.</p>
<blockquote><p>The reason for this cognitive disconnect is that we have evolved brains that pay attention to anecdotes because false positives (believing there is a connection between A and B when there is not) are usually harmless, whereas false negatives (believing there is no connection between A and B when there is) may take you out of the gene pool. Our brains are belief engines that employ association learning to seek and find patterns. Superstition and belief in magic are millions of years old, whereas science, with its methods of controlling for intervening variables to circumvent false positives, is only a few hundred years old. So it is that any medical huckster promising that A will cure B has only to advertise a handful of successful anecdotes in the form of testimonials.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orca the Killer Mama</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-10682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orca the Killer Mama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-10682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well, I&#039;ll be quite honest, I don&#039;t give a hells bells about all your opinions on Eye Q.  if it weren&#039;t for all the adverts I would n&#039;t have tried it on my daughter and it has been a MIRACLE for her.

&lt;strong&gt;Admin edit: that is excellent news for your daughter. Our objections are to the &#039;standards&#039; of evidence used to support it and the inflated advertising claims.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, I&#8217;ll be quite honest, I don&#8217;t give a hells bells about all your opinions on Eye Q.  if it weren&#8217;t for all the adverts I would n&#8217;t have tried it on my daughter and it has been a MIRACLE for her.</p>
<p><strong>Admin edit: that is excellent news for your daughter. Our objections are to the &#8216;standards&#8217; of evidence used to support it and the inflated advertising claims.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My (Paid) Friend Says This Product Is Really Good: FFTB and Cherry-Picking &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-9580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My (Paid) Friend Says This Product Is Really Good: FFTB and Cherry-Picking &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-9580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] others have a little hint of controversy: e.g., Equazen and Cherry Active. Readers may recall that Equazen eye Q was recently reprimanded by the ASA for over-stating the demonstrable benefits of its products. We don&#8217;t know what evidence [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] others have a little hint of controversy: e.g., Equazen and Cherry Active. Readers may recall that Equazen eye Q was recently reprimanded by the ASA for over-stating the demonstrable benefits of its products. We don&#8217;t know what evidence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food for the Brain Child Survey: Review Part 1 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/comment-page-1/#comment-7627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food for the Brain Child Survey: Review Part 1 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/12/patrick-holford-food-for-the-brain-and-equazen/#comment-7627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and are not therefore readily generalisable to the more general population of children. Even the ASA has had cause to review these papers when adjudicating against Equazen&#8217;s advertising claim... and they dismissed them as inadequate to support the grandiose claims made for them. It is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and are not therefore readily generalisable to the more general population of children. Even the ASA has had cause to review these papers when adjudicating against Equazen&#8217;s advertising claim&#8230; and they dismissed them as inadequate to support the grandiose claims made for them. It is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

