Comments on: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 2

By: Who Wrote About Food for the Brain in The Economist: Conflict of Interest? « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:39:24 +0000

[...] Holford Watch looks at the literature review: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]

By: The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:45:15 +0000

By: Our Original Questions to Patrick Holford About the Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007 « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:37:29 +0000

By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 6 « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:57:19 +0000

By: Patrick Holford Flip-Flops on Sugary Drinks? (FFTB Survey Review Part 7) « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:55:08 +0000

By: Why don’t FFTB report their survey results on supplement pills? Survey review part 9 « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:35:04 +0000

[...] the fact that the survey’s literature review proclaims that there is a benefit from using supplement pills, and suggests that there may be a [...]

By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 5 « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:19:44 +0000

[...] extensive (some say mercilessly thorough) examination of the FFTB Report in several parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4. We have many, many questions about the data and analysis in the FFTB Report. We [...]

By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 3 « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:06:45 +0000

[...] sufficient quality. Part 1 discusses the claims relating to supplements and children’s diet. Part 2 examines the claims made for the benefit of a balanced glycaemic load diet for children. For Part 3, we discuss the claims for the alleged incidence of food sensitivities and gluten [...]

By: Food for the Brain Child Survey: Review Part 1 « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:31:39 +0000

[...] Review Part 2 examines the report’s claims for glycaemic load and its impact on children’s mood and performance. [...]