<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Wrote About Food for the Brain in The Economist: Conflict of Interest? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-13611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Wrote About Food for the Brain in The Economist: Conflict of Interest? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-13611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-12961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-12961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Original Questions to Patrick Holford About the Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-8982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Our Original Questions to Patrick Holford About the Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-8982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 6 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-8297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 6 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-8297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 1 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 2 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 3 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 4 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 5 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-8189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 5 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-8189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (some say mercilessly thorough) examination of the FFTB Report in several parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4. We have many, many questions about the data and analysis in the FFTB Report. We wanted [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (some say mercilessly thorough) examination of the FFTB Report in several parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4. We have many, many questions about the data and analysis in the FFTB Report. We wanted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-8151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-8151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[slightly off topic, but just picked this up from BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7213499.stm

&quot;Fish oil: a cure for young offenders?&quot;

...A major trial is to be launched to see whether giving young offenders nutritional supplements reduces anti-social behaviour in prison. Its authors believe this could prove a seminal piece of research with major implications for the criminal justice system.

Young offenders, including murderers, in three institutions in the UK are to be given a cocktail of vitamins, minerals and &quot;essential fatty acids&quot; on top of their normal prison diet.

Their behaviour will be compared with others who are given a placebo.

Researchers, funded by the Wellcome Trust, have high hopes for the million pound trial on 1,000 volunteers - the largest of its kind - after a much smaller study did find supplements had a favourable impact on levels of violence and ill-discipline in one institution in Aylesbury.

This is not about improving prison food, which the team believe is - from a nutritional perspective at least - more than satisfactory. &quot;The problem is that prisoners do not make good dietary choices,&quot; says Professor John Stein of Oxford University, &quot;and that&#039;s what we&#039;re trying to overcome.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>slightly off topic, but just picked this up from BBC:<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7213499.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7213499.stm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Fish oil: a cure for young offenders?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;A major trial is to be launched to see whether giving young offenders nutritional supplements reduces anti-social behaviour in prison. Its authors believe this could prove a seminal piece of research with major implications for the criminal justice system.</p>
<p>Young offenders, including murderers, in three institutions in the UK are to be given a cocktail of vitamins, minerals and &#8220;essential fatty acids&#8221; on top of their normal prison diet.</p>
<p>Their behaviour will be compared with others who are given a placebo.</p>
<p>Researchers, funded by the Wellcome Trust, have high hopes for the million pound trial on 1,000 volunteers &#8211; the largest of its kind &#8211; after a much smaller study did find supplements had a favourable impact on levels of violence and ill-discipline in one institution in Aylesbury.</p>
<p>This is not about improving prison food, which the team believe is &#8211; from a nutritional perspective at least &#8211; more than satisfactory. &#8220;The problem is that prisoners do not make good dietary choices,&#8221; says Professor John Stein of Oxford University, &#8220;and that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re trying to overcome.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonhw</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-8112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonhw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=319#comment-8112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow - it&#039;s striking how many problems there were with the literature review.  I can&#039;t help but think that that we may have got the rough end of the stick here: Holford and Fobbester write a very concise lit review, and then we have to go over it in detail, to produce several long posts on the problems with this review :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; it&#8217;s striking how many problems there were with the literature review.  I can&#8217;t help but think that that we may have got the rough end of the stick here: Holford and Fobbester write a very concise lit review, and then we have to go over it in detail, to produce several long posts on the problems with this review :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

