<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford Promotes Error: Does This Explain His Continuing Support for Opposing MMR and Supporting Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Research? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-15156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford Promotes Error: Does This Explain His Continuing Support for Opposing MMR and Supporting Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Research? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-15156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] may remember Patrick Holford&#8217;s keen support for Andrew Wakefield and his research (see, also, Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield’s Discredited Findings: Part 1 and Part 2). we have previously noted that Holford espouses support for Wakefield and his research [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may remember Patrick Holford&#8217;s keen support for Andrew Wakefield and his research (see, also, Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield’s Discredited Findings: Part 1 and Part 2). we have previously noted that Holford espouses support for Wakefield and his research [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford on Andrew Wakefield: He Needs to Issue an Update &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-15007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford on Andrew Wakefield: He Needs to Issue an Update &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-15007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and practices endured in the Autism Omnibus hearings. See, Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield; Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield’s Discredited Findings: Part 1 and Part [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and practices endured in the Autism Omnibus hearings. See, Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield; Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield’s Discredited Findings: Part 1 and Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Barnett and the Missing Blog Posts About MMR Segment on LBC Radio &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-14800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeni Barnett and the Missing Blog Posts About MMR Segment on LBC Radio &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-14800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] as both Jeni Barnett and Patrick Holford (plus, 1 and &lt;a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as both Jeni Barnett and Patrick Holford (plus, 1 and &lt;a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Deer Discusses Andrew Wakefield in the Sunday Times &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-14692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Deer Discusses Andrew Wakefield in the Sunday Times &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-14692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that Wakefield&#8217;s research papers and practices endured in the Autism Omnibus hearings? See, Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield’s Discredited Findings: Part 1 and Part [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Wakefield&#8217;s research papers and practices endured in the Autism Omnibus hearings? See, Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield’s Discredited Findings: Part 1 and Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Barnett admits that she failed to act as a responsible broadcaster, following ridiculous LBC broadcast about MMR: Updated several times &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-14624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeni Barnett admits that she failed to act as a responsible broadcaster, following ridiculous LBC broadcast about MMR: Updated several times &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-14624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Holford and Andrew Wakefield: Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings Part 1 and Part [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Holford and Andrew Wakefield: Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings Part 1 and Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We Feared &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-10389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We Feared &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-10389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that MMR is linked to findings of measles virus in the gut or contributes to autism. See, e.g., Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings Part 1 and Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings Part 2. This lack of any [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that MMR is linked to findings of measles virus in the gut or contributes to autism. See, e.g., Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings Part 1 and Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings Part 2. This lack of any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre Usually Gets The Science Wrong: Patrick Holford Speaks From His Own Reality &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre Usually Gets The Science Wrong: Patrick Holford Speaks From His Own Reality &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-9028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and more about Holford&#8217;s lack of understanding of that research or subsequent developments (Parts 1 and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and more about Holford&#8217;s lack of understanding of that research or subsequent developments (Parts 1 and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonhw</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonhw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-8120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Sophie - glad you found this useful.  We&#039;ve now added a &lt;a href=&quot;http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/26/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt; to this post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sophie &#8211; glad you found this useful.  We&#8217;ve now added a <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/26/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-2/" rel="nofollow">Part 2</a> to this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings: Part 2 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings: Part 2 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-8119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Holford&#160;Myths        &#8592; Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings: Part&#160;1 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Holford&nbsp;Myths        &larr; Patrick Holford and Andrew Wakefield&#8217;s Discredited Findings: Part&nbsp;1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/25/patrick-holford-and-andrew-wakefields-discredited-findings-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sophie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-8117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to say thankyou! Been confused about the ins and outs of this for a while- nice to have it laid out point by point. Love your work :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thankyou! Been confused about the ins and outs of this for a while- nice to have it laid out point by point. Love your work :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

