<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holford&#8217;s Health Products for Life breaches ASA rules on truthfulness and substantiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford and the Vitamins for Asthma That Become All About Food Intolerance and YorkTest &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-19007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford and the Vitamins for Asthma That Become All About Food Intolerance and YorkTest &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-19007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] without any evidence to support those assertions, it would not be appropriate for either Holford or YorkTest to make those claims about the efficacy of York Test or asthma in an advertisement without falling [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] without any evidence to support those assertions, it would not be appropriate for either Holford or YorkTest to make those claims about the efficacy of York Test or asthma in an advertisement without falling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-8286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-8286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kind of off topic but speaking to my nervousness about asthmatics being encouraged to self-diagnose  food allergy, this made my jaw drop when I happened on it several days ago:
http://www.revolutionhealth.com/stories/view/227ace6574914861a533f7b4dbd957ab 

&quot;...Furthermore, Carol says, you can actually use your control pause to indicate whether you are allergic to a food. You take your CP, eat the food, and then take your CP again after 10 and 20 minutes. If it drops radically, you may be allergic. No need for an elimination diet.  After taking the  Buteyko  training, I learned that I was allergic to apples.  I&#039;d eat an apple, and right away, I&#039;d have trouble breathing.  Even dried apples would do it. So,  now I know to avoid apples.

The ideal diet, according to Dr. Buteyko, would make a vegan sound indulgent. Of course, no meat, no eggs, no dairy, not even youghurt. But also, no concentrated protein of any kind – no nuts, no soy. And, of course, no caffeine, no chocolate. Even for a vegetarian (which I am), this diet feels claustrophobic. Foods that decrease breathing include garlic, onions, cayenne, black pepper, ginger and horse radish. This is good to know, because with such a limited diet, you’ll need something spicy to distract you from the monotony. ...&quot;

Novel &#039;diagnosis&#039; technique  apart, the diet sounds extremely restrictive and likely to result in nutritional deficiencies. Food allergy in asthma needs proper, professional care.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of off topic but speaking to my nervousness about asthmatics being encouraged to self-diagnose  food allergy, this made my jaw drop when I happened on it several days ago:<br />
<a href="http://www.revolutionhealth.com/stories/view/227ace6574914861a533f7b4dbd957ab" rel="nofollow">http://www.revolutionhealth.com/stories/view/227ace6574914861a533f7b4dbd957ab</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Furthermore, Carol says, you can actually use your control pause to indicate whether you are allergic to a food. You take your CP, eat the food, and then take your CP again after 10 and 20 minutes. If it drops radically, you may be allergic. No need for an elimination diet.  After taking the  Buteyko  training, I learned that I was allergic to apples.  I&#8217;d eat an apple, and right away, I&#8217;d have trouble breathing.  Even dried apples would do it. So,  now I know to avoid apples.</p>
<p>The ideal diet, according to Dr. Buteyko, would make a vegan sound indulgent. Of course, no meat, no eggs, no dairy, not even youghurt. But also, no concentrated protein of any kind – no nuts, no soy. And, of course, no caffeine, no chocolate. Even for a vegetarian (which I am), this diet feels claustrophobic. Foods that decrease breathing include garlic, onions, cayenne, black pepper, ginger and horse radish. This is good to know, because with such a limited diet, you’ll need something spicy to distract you from the monotony. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Novel &#8216;diagnosis&#8217; technique  apart, the diet sounds extremely restrictive and likely to result in nutritional deficiencies. Food allergy in asthma needs proper, professional care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counterknowledge.com &#187; Professor Holford and the ASA</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-8268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Counterknowledge.com &#187; Professor Holford and the ASA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-8268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ever-vigilant Holfordwatch wonders: Making claims that one can’t substantiate or prove to be truthful - and using these [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever-vigilant Holfordwatch wonders: Making claims that one can’t substantiate or prove to be truthful &#8211; and using these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-8165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-8165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if this is a consequence of spreading misinformation about food allergy? - 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/31/nallergy131.xml . 

Given the shortage of paediatric allergy specialists here in the UK and the long waiting times (in most areas) for access to a knowledgeable, properly qualified dietitian, such parents are prey to all kinds of anxieties and vulnerable to putting their very young children on ill-advised exclusion diets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this is a consequence of spreading misinformation about food allergy? &#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/31/nallergy131.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/31/nallergy131.xml</a> . </p>
<p>Given the shortage of paediatric allergy specialists here in the UK and the long waiting times (in most areas) for access to a knowledgeable, properly qualified dietitian, such parents are prey to all kinds of anxieties and vulnerable to putting their very young children on ill-advised exclusion diets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-8163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-8163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see Mr Holford&#039;s own &#039;Holford Myths&#039; site makes no mention at all of the Sept. 2007  House of Lords allergy report, specifically their statements relating to dtc tests for self diagnosis of food allergy/food intolerance and their direction to professionals and charities not to recommend them - http://www.patrickholford.com/content.asp?id_Content=2178 
&quot;...True: Patrick Holford considers food intolerance/allergy to be a critical health factor and IgG Food Intolerance/allergy tests to be a useful indicator of potential food intolerance/allergy...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Mr Holford&#8217;s own &#8216;Holford Myths&#8217; site makes no mention at all of the Sept. 2007  House of Lords allergy report, specifically their statements relating to dtc tests for self diagnosis of food allergy/food intolerance and their direction to professionals and charities not to recommend them &#8211; <a href="http://www.patrickholford.com/content.asp?id_Content=2178" rel="nofollow">http://www.patrickholford.com/content.asp?id_Content=2178</a><br />
&#8220;&#8230;True: Patrick Holford considers food intolerance/allergy to be a critical health factor and IgG Food Intolerance/allergy tests to be a useful indicator of potential food intolerance/allergy&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tifosi246</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-8162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tifosi246]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-8162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst individual rulings won&#039;t make a difference, the repeating series of judgements against Prof. Holford from the  independent body of the ASA will add to the death of his unjustifiable claims by a thousand cuts.

It&#039;s a shame the ASA has no teeth to ensure no more repeat offences, but as you say, Teek, it is a moment to savour for people who believe in &#039;truth in advertising&#039; or who object to the medicalisation of everyday life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst individual rulings won&#8217;t make a difference, the repeating series of judgements against Prof. Holford from the  independent body of the ASA will add to the death of his unjustifiable claims by a thousand cuts.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame the ASA has no teeth to ensure no more repeat offences, but as you say, Teek, it is a moment to savour for people who believe in &#8216;truth in advertising&#8217; or who object to the medicalisation of everyday life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teek</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/30/holfords-health-products-for-life-breaches-asa-rules-on-truthfulness-and-substantiation/comment-page-1/#comment-8160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=329#comment-8160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:-) nice - this sort of thing shows that the ASA is switched on, and that using unsubstantiated innuendo to sell pills won&#039;t wash - the question is, will Holford&#039;s increasing collection of rulings against stop him and his ilk from trying it on in the future? i for one doubt it, not that this should come in the way of us enjoying the moment...!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-) nice &#8211; this sort of thing shows that the ASA is switched on, and that using unsubstantiated innuendo to sell pills won&#8217;t wash &#8211; the question is, will Holford&#8217;s increasing collection of rulings against stop him and his ilk from trying it on in the future? i for one doubt it, not that this should come in the way of us enjoying the moment&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

