<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Wrote About Food for the Brain in The Economist: Conflict of Interest? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-13178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who Wrote About Food for the Brain in The Economist: Conflict of Interest? &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-13178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] report and then looks at the data and analyses: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 7 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 8 Why Don&#8217;t Food for the Brain Report Their Survey Results on Supplement Pills Survey: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report and then looks at the data and analyses: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 7 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 8 Why Don&#8217;t Food for the Brain Report Their Survey Results on Supplement Pills Survey: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-12964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-12964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] report and then looks at the data and analyses: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 7 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 8 Why Don&#8217;t Food for the Brain Report Their Survey Results on Supplement Pills Survey: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report and then looks at the data and analyses: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 7 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 8 Why Don&#8217;t Food for the Brain Report Their Survey Results on Supplement Pills Survey: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford Responds to Radio 4 Programme and Misses the Point: Part 2b &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-9007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford Responds to Radio 4 Programme and Misses the Point: Part 2b &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-9007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] done to salvage the report because the data collection and analyses are seriously flawed. There are serious issues concerning the survey questions and this is yet another object lesson in why research must be conducted using standardised and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done to salvage the report because the data collection and analyses are seriously flawed. There are serious issues concerning the survey questions and this is yet another object lesson in why research must be conducted using standardised and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Original Questions to Patrick Holford About the Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Our Original Questions to Patrick Holford About the Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] report and then looks at the data and analyses: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 7 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 8 Why Don&#8217;t Food for the Brain Report Their Survey Results on Supplement Pills Survey: Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report and then looks at the data and analyses: Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 7 Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007: Review Part 8 Why Don&#8217;t Food for the Brain Report Their Survey Results on Supplement Pills Survey: Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chair of FFTB Scientific Advisory Board acknowledges that their research hasn&#8217;t been &#8220;a proper job&#8221; and hasn&#8217;t been &#8220;rigorous&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chair of FFTB Scientific Advisory Board acknowledges that their research hasn&#8217;t been &#8220;a proper job&#8221; and hasn&#8217;t been &#8220;rigorous&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] reporting of results is also inadequate: this is partial, and the representation and statistical analysis of the results [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reporting of results is also inadequate: this is partial, and the representation and statistical analysis of the results [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 10 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 10 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part 8 of this review we looked at the alleged benefits of eating dark green leafy vegetables. For this post, we look at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 8 of this review we looked at the alleged benefits of eating dark green leafy vegetables. For this post, we look at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Food for the Brain: Child Survey. A proper job?</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Food for the Brain: Child Survey. A proper job?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and authors of the Food for the Brain Child Survey , September 2007  (pdf). Holfordwatch has made a very thorough study of this report, in eight parts (so far). They conclude  &#8220;HolfordWatch  can not share the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and authors of the Food for the Brain Child Survey , September 2007  (pdf). Holfordwatch has made a very thorough study of this report, in eight parts (so far). They conclude  &#8220;HolfordWatch  can not share the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see Equazen has been ordered to remove brain health claims by ASA:
http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=83128&amp;m=1FNE208&amp;c=ebhivpohwsvzmdw]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Equazen has been ordered to remove brain health claims by ASA:<br />
<a href="http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=83128&#038;m=1FNE208&#038;c=ebhivpohwsvzmdw" rel="nofollow">http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=83128&#038;m=1FNE208&#038;c=ebhivpohwsvzmdw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Tifosi. However, sorry to crush those dreams of finding a useful purpose for the shredded reports:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe a large batch could be pulped and used as mulch for growing dark green leafy vegetables (DGLV’s)? 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Apparently, the extensive use of shredded glossy paper with colour inks is deprecated for growing vegetables because of the heavy metal content of the inks. 

Nice try, tho&#039;. I like the way you are thinking - practical, trying to save something from the wreckage in a way that might save the face of the organic sponsors, Organix who paid for this data analysis and who provided a foreword for this report...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tifosi. However, sorry to crush those dreams of finding a useful purpose for the shredded reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe a large batch could be pulped and used as mulch for growing dark green leafy vegetables (DGLV’s)?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently, the extensive use of shredded glossy paper with colour inks is deprecated for growing vegetables because of the heavy metal content of the inks. </p>
<p>Nice try, tho&#8217;. I like the way you are thinking &#8211; practical, trying to save something from the wreckage in a way that might save the face of the organic sponsors, Organix who paid for this data analysis and who provided a foreword for this report&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/02/07/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-review-part-8/comment-page-1/#comment-8249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-8249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS - couldn&#039;t agree more about the cooked in hot fat question. In an earlier post on HW that mentioned the &lt;a href=&quot;http://holfordwatch.info/2007/09/12/patrick-holford-calls-some-children-stupid-and-claims-that-some-foods-make-them-thicker/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FFTB report&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;On a usability testing note, the questionnaire included unclearly worded questions and did not provide explanatory footnotes. E.g., whether I cook from scratch or cook for the freezer, it is not unusual for my preparations to start with frying an onion. You will understand that this is not deep-frying and I am not referring to cooking battered onion rings, tempura or pakora in recycled fat. Nonetheless, Q. 60 asks how many times a child “Eat(s) fried food, takeaway food or foods cooked in heated fat?” Is sweating down onions or other vegetables in olive oil prior to making a soup, casserole, dhal or pasta sauce really equivalent to (say) a deep-fried, battered fish or chips? Does a stir-fry or frittata count or not? If the way in which somebody cooked the food, or its quantity, is relevant, then the question needs to be expressed differently and with appropriate nuance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; couldn&#8217;t agree more about the cooked in hot fat question. In an earlier post on HW that mentioned the <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/09/12/patrick-holford-calls-some-children-stupid-and-claims-that-some-foods-make-them-thicker/" rel="nofollow">FFTB report</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>On a usability testing note, the questionnaire included unclearly worded questions and did not provide explanatory footnotes. E.g., whether I cook from scratch or cook for the freezer, it is not unusual for my preparations to start with frying an onion. You will understand that this is not deep-frying and I am not referring to cooking battered onion rings, tempura or pakora in recycled fat. Nonetheless, Q. 60 asks how many times a child “Eat(s) fried food, takeaway food or foods cooked in heated fat?” Is sweating down onions or other vegetables in olive oil prior to making a soup, casserole, dhal or pasta sauce really equivalent to (say) a deep-fried, battered fish or chips? Does a stir-fry or frittata count or not? If the way in which somebody cooked the food, or its quantity, is relevant, then the question needs to be expressed differently and with appropriate nuance.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

