The Energy Equation and Co-enzyme Q10: Holford the Pioneer

Co-enzyme Q10 (CoQ10) has been getting some attention lately, off the back of a Boots marketing campaign. David Colquhoun has described Boots’ marketing of these pills as “as bad a bit of nutribollocks as I’ve ever seen”, while Ben Goldacre has also criticised the way in which CoQ10 is marketed as a solution to low energy levels.  Interestingly, though, Holford was ahead of the curve here: in 1988 his book The Energy Equation proudly proclaimed on the cover that it was “INTRODUCING CO-ENZYME Q”.

Holford is still involved in marketing CoQ10: one can now buy CoQ10 (and Carnitine) Biocare pills with Holford’s face on the bottle (see Coracle’s blog for a critical assessment of Holford’s CoQ10 recommendations).  Neutrahealth PLC (who own Biocare) have stated that “CoQ10 expected to perform well in 2008 with year to date sales growth of 35%”.

Patrick Holford’s CV [PDF] states that he “is a pioneer in new approaches to health and nutrition”. Here at HolfordWatch, we would have to agree. However, whether those approaches work or not is another question.

Advertisement

9 Comments

Filed under patrick holford

9 Responses to The Energy Equation and Co-enzyme Q10: Holford the Pioneer

  1. Did someone say CoQ10?

    Dammit, I was there first before these jonny-come-latelies Goldacre and Colquhoun *shakes fist*

  2. draust

    Kudos, Coracle -perhaps I won’t bother with CoQ10!!

    I was a bit tempted since I have worked on both mitochondrial metabolism and oxidative stress over the years. Perhaps if I go and do some cells-in-a-dish experiments with CoQ10 I will be able to publish them in Patrick’s favourite Alt-organ the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine (aka “J Nutri-twaddle”)

    BTW, if you never got the Marcoff Q10 / statinopathy review in Am J Cardiol, and are still interested, let me know.

  3. Pingback: Boots reaches new level of dishonesty with CoQ10 promotion

  4. Thanks Coracle – interesting post, and I’ve added a link into the above.

  5. Ephistopheles

    Hmm…
    Interesting talk…

  6. Mac

    OK!!!!
    Today David Colquhoun explained me his point of view personally. I make nothing against him longer and I withdraw my words against David Colquhoun.

    Dear Holfordwatch.
    I ask you delete my comment. David has vindicated that he is worthy to be Professor. He showed that he is real Scotchman ;)

    PS. This statement doesn’t concern of Ben Goldacre. He hasn’t proved anything still. However, I have no claim, because I am not interested in him at all. Delete my comment in whole.

  7. Ephistopheles

    Oh! More interesting! ;)

  8. Ephistopheles

    It seems Colquhon is my future client… ;)

  9. Pingback: Patrick Holford on Statins and Why You Should Spend Money on His Supplements As Well or Instead « Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s