<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC put Holford&#8217;s science to the test.  It fails.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Goldacre&#8217;s Rise of the Lifestyle Nutritionists on Radio 4 Won a Norwich Union Medical Journalism Award &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-13504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre&#8217;s Rise of the Lifestyle Nutritionists on Radio 4 Won a Norwich Union Medical Journalism Award &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-13504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the time, we wrote: A number of people have chosen to associate themselves with Holford&#8217;s work, and to act as if [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the time, we wrote: A number of people have chosen to associate themselves with Holford&#8217;s work, and to act as if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canard-ridden Holford interview in National Health Executive Review &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-13215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canard-ridden Holford interview in National Health Executive Review &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-13215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] When Prof Tom Sanders - an academic expert on nutrition - analysed some of Holford&#8217;s work he was highly critical, not because of professional jealousy but because of the poor quality of Holford&#8217;s research. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When Prof Tom Sanders &#8211; an academic expert on nutrition &#8211; analysed some of Holford&#8217;s work he was highly critical, not because of professional jealousy but because of the poor quality of Holford&#8217;s research. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post #350: &#8220;If you think I have been overly critical, I would invite you to notice that they win&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-11995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Post #350: &#8220;If you think I have been overly critical, I would invite you to notice that they win&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-11995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] inaccurate) on a range of serious medical conditions. Despite Holford featuring prominently in a BBC documentary on Lifestyle Nutritionists - with the eminent nutritionist Prof Tom Sanders assessing the poor quality of Holford&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] inaccurate) on a range of serious medical conditions. Despite Holford featuring prominently in a BBC documentary on Lifestyle Nutritionists &#8211; with the eminent nutritionist Prof Tom Sanders assessing the poor quality of Holford&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-8989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-8989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Annie - it is Holford who argues that he has scientific proof for his recommendations. If you were to look round this blog - you would learn that there are many times that this proof doesn&#039;t exist, or he literally gets the sums wrong.

Do you want to take your advice from somebody like that? Fine - your money, your health. But, should that person influence public policy or research agenda - I would say, &quot;Absolutely not&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie &#8211; it is Holford who argues that he has scientific proof for his recommendations. If you were to look round this blog &#8211; you would learn that there are many times that this proof doesn&#8217;t exist, or he literally gets the sums wrong.</p>
<p>Do you want to take your advice from somebody like that? Fine &#8211; your money, your health. But, should that person influence public policy or research agenda &#8211; I would say, &#8220;Absolutely not&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superburger</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-8987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superburger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-8987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so, annie, we shouldn&#039;t ask questions about the world.

If a smiling face on GMTV tells us to take a pill we should. 

That&#039;s not really very empowering is it?

What&#039;s so wrong with asking honest questions about ourselves and the world. Don&#039;t you think  there&#039;s something worthwhile in that.

Don&#039;t you think there&#039;s at least *some* interest in asking whether a pill *really* works or whether it&#039;s just the power of our own minds making us believe it has an effect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, annie, we shouldn&#8217;t ask questions about the world.</p>
<p>If a smiling face on GMTV tells us to take a pill we should. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not really very empowering is it?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s so wrong with asking honest questions about ourselves and the world. Don&#8217;t you think  there&#8217;s something worthwhile in that.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think there&#8217;s at least *some* interest in asking whether a pill *really* works or whether it&#8217;s just the power of our own minds making us believe it has an effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-8986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-8986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proof is in the pudding.  Why cant folk out there listen to their own bodies without having to always have scientific proof.  We are all unique and all respond in different ways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proof is in the pudding.  Why cant folk out there listen to their own bodies without having to always have scientific proof.  We are all unique and all respond in different ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/03/31/bbc-put-holfords-science-to-the-test-it-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-8971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-8971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi there, i have an off topic question.  a while back you posted in the WP forums asking how to import posts to wordpress from a blogger FTP blog.  you said you figured it out (and it looks like you did) but I am having the same problems you are and would LOVE to know how you managed it.  thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there, i have an off topic question.  a while back you posted in the WP forums asking how to import posts to wordpress from a blogger FTP blog.  you said you figured it out (and it looks like you did) but I am having the same problems you are and would LOVE to know how you managed it.  thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

