<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Original Questions to Patrick Holford About the Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/02/our-original-questions-to-patrick-holford-about-the-food-for-the-brain-child-survey-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/02/our-original-questions-to-patrick-holford-about-the-food-for-the-brain-child-survey-2007/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford Responds to Radio 4 Programme and Misses the Point: To Be Fair, So Does Stephanie Fox &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/02/our-original-questions-to-patrick-holford-about-the-food-for-the-brain-child-survey-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-8996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford Responds to Radio 4 Programme and Misses the Point: To Be Fair, So Does Stephanie Fox &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-8996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] if we may, we still have a problem. We have written to Holford and to members of the FFTB Scientific Advisory Board, we had no response from Holford and little assistance from Professors Philip Cowen and David [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if we may, we still have a problem. We have written to Holford and to members of the FFTB Scientific Advisory Board, we had no response from Holford and little assistance from Professors Philip Cowen and David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonhw</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/02/our-original-questions-to-patrick-holford-about-the-food-for-the-brain-child-survey-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonhw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=390#comment-8988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is bizarre: I never thought that this report could have been so flawed.  One does wonder what role Food for the Brain&#039;s Scientific Advisory Board played in this: did they approve of these novel approaches to the data.

As you say - these &#039;answers&#039; only serve to raise more questions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bizarre: I never thought that this report could have been so flawed.  One does wonder what role Food for the Brain&#8217;s Scientific Advisory Board played in this: did they approve of these novel approaches to the data.</p>
<p>As you say &#8211; these &#8216;answers&#8217; only serve to raise more questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

