<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holford tries to do vaccination science.  He fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth About Vaccines: Vaccines And Autism &#171; Stuff And Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-3/#comment-23665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Truth About Vaccines: Vaccines And Autism &#171; Stuff And Nonsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-23665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] by an author who failed to declare a significant competing interest. It is also worth reading this post on Patrick Holford&#8217;s views. It seems that Halvorsen is not alone in misinterpreting [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by an author who failed to declare a significant competing interest. It is also worth reading this post on Patrick Holford&#8217;s views. It seems that Halvorsen is not alone in misinterpreting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wakefield Responds to Brian Deer: Summary, &#8220;I regret nothing&#8230;Single jabs are the way ahead&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Wakefield Responds to Brian Deer: Summary, &#8220;I regret nothing&#8230;Single jabs are the way ahead&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-14727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (pdf). Wakefield continues to imply that any mistakes are the responsibility of his colleagues (see earlier indications of this) and his clearest message is that he regrets nothing:  There was and continues to be every [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (pdf). Wakefield continues to imply that any mistakes are the responsibility of his colleagues (see earlier indications of this) and his clearest message is that he regrets nothing:  There was and continues to be every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-13448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-13448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tangentially relevant to jdc325&#039;s comment, &lt;a href=&quot;http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kwn253&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;there&#039;s a recent cohort study from Denmark&lt;/a&gt; , the findings of which suggest: 

&quot;...These results are compatible not with an increased risk of asthma following MMR vaccination but rather with the hypothesis that MMR vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of asthma-like disease in young children. &quot;

With regard to the &quot;1983&quot; claim, I recall earlier this year reading a media article by Robert Wood (head of paediatric allergy, Johns Hopkins), about safety of other legumes in peanut allergy. I&#039;ll google the exact reference when I have time later but I seem to remember him saying that there were recommendations in the 1970s and 80s for peanut allergic people to avoid related legumes but work at Johns Hopkins showed this was not necessary. So looks like people were afflicted by this before 1983.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tangentially relevant to jdc325&#8242;s comment, <a href="http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kwn253" rel="nofollow">there&#8217;s a recent cohort study from Denmark</a> , the findings of which suggest: </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;These results are compatible not with an increased risk of asthma following MMR vaccination but rather with the hypothesis that MMR vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of asthma-like disease in young children. &#8221;</p>
<p>With regard to the &#8220;1983&#8243; claim, I recall earlier this year reading a media article by Robert Wood (head of paediatric allergy, Johns Hopkins), about safety of other legumes in peanut allergy. I&#8217;ll google the exact reference when I have time later but I seem to remember him saying that there were recommendations in the 1970s and 80s for peanut allergic people to avoid related legumes but work at Johns Hopkins showed this was not necessary. So looks like people were afflicted by this before 1983.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdc325</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-13445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdc325]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-13445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incidentally, this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1262606&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt; from 1976 refers to detection of peanut and nut allergies [they were looking at the usefulness of the radioallergosorbent test in highly allergic patients in whom skin testing poses a risk of anaphylaxis].]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, this <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1262606" rel="nofollow">paper</a> from 1976 refers to detection of peanut and nut allergies [they were looking at the usefulness of the radioallergosorbent test in highly allergic patients in whom skin testing poses a risk of anaphylaxis].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdc325</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-13444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdc325]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-13444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to revisit an old topic, but I read this - &quot;In 1983, 10 shots given before age 6, now 36 shots recommended before age 6.&quot; - and thought of a couple of interesting webpages I&#039;d read recently.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/immune_overload/en/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WHO&lt;/a&gt; page on &#039;immune overload&#039; links to abstracts of some very interesting papers. According to both Offit et al and Miller et al, &lt;i&gt;vaccinated children in fact have fewer infections than unvaccinated children&lt;/i&gt; - while Hilton, Petticrew and Hunt point out that we don&#039;t actually know &quot;how British parents conceptualise the notion of ‘immune-overload’ or how they relate this concept to their own children&quot;.

&quot;And people wonder why in 1983, they had never heard of autism or severe peanut allergies?&quot;
There is an excellent blog post on ScienceBasedMedicine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=95&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; that looks at a paper studying adults who were diagnosed in 1980 with a developmental language disorder. Dorothy Bishop asked &quot;if these people were subjected to current diagnostic criteria for autism, how many of them would be diagnosed today as having autism?&quot; She found that 25% of them would.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to revisit an old topic, but I read this &#8211; &#8220;In 1983, 10 shots given before age 6, now 36 shots recommended before age 6.&#8221; &#8211; and thought of a couple of interesting webpages I&#8217;d read recently.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/immune_overload/en/index.html" rel="nofollow">WHO</a> page on &#8216;immune overload&#8217; links to abstracts of some very interesting papers. According to both Offit et al and Miller et al, <i>vaccinated children in fact have fewer infections than unvaccinated children</i> &#8211; while Hilton, Petticrew and Hunt point out that we don&#8217;t actually know &#8220;how British parents conceptualise the notion of ‘immune-overload’ or how they relate this concept to their own children&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;And people wonder why in 1983, they had never heard of autism or severe peanut allergies?&#8221;<br />
There is an excellent blog post on ScienceBasedMedicine <a href="http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=95" rel="nofollow">here</a> that looks at a paper studying adults who were diagnosed in 1980 with a developmental language disorder. Dorothy Bishop asked &#8220;if these people were subjected to current diagnostic criteria for autism, how many of them would be diagnosed today as having autism?&#8221; She found that 25% of them would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-13439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-13439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is plain that you didn&#039;t read the article.

We are familiar with the authors that you recommend so should not be surprised that you did not read the piece: &lt;b&gt;your reading recommendations are without merit&lt;/b&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is plain that you didn&#8217;t read the article.</p>
<p>We are familiar with the authors that you recommend so should not be surprised that you did not read the piece: <b>your reading recommendations are without merit</b>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marquez</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-13429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marquez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-13429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I happened upon this website and observed the chart.  I did not bother to read the rest of the article for two reasons:  I have children and housework to look after, and if the chart is any indication of the stupidity of the rest of the article, it is a waste of time.   My daughter became allergic to her milk based formula less than two days after her four month shots.  Her second day of rice cereal, she threw it all up.  After a year and a half of her throwing up, an allergy test revealed she was allergic to peanuts, nuts, milk, eggs, which we knew, and chicken, beef, rice, etc.  After her four month shots, her system was never the same again.  Read Jenny McCarthy&#039;s Warrior Mothers.  Read Parents Magazine February 2000 issue, &quot;How We Cured Our Son&#039;s Autism&quot; by Karyn Seroussi, read Dr. Sherri Tenpenny&#039;s research, before you put out such ridiculous charts!  In 1983, 10 shots given before age 6, now 36 shots recommended before age 6.  And people wonder why in 1983, they had never heard of autism or severe peanut allergies?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happened upon this website and observed the chart.  I did not bother to read the rest of the article for two reasons:  I have children and housework to look after, and if the chart is any indication of the stupidity of the rest of the article, it is a waste of time.   My daughter became allergic to her milk based formula less than two days after her four month shots.  Her second day of rice cereal, she threw it all up.  After a year and a half of her throwing up, an allergy test revealed she was allergic to peanuts, nuts, milk, eggs, which we knew, and chicken, beef, rice, etc.  After her four month shots, her system was never the same again.  Read Jenny McCarthy&#8217;s Warrior Mothers.  Read Parents Magazine February 2000 issue, &#8220;How We Cured Our Son&#8217;s Autism&#8221; by Karyn Seroussi, read Dr. Sherri Tenpenny&#8217;s research, before you put out such ridiculous charts!  In 1983, 10 shots given before age 6, now 36 shots recommended before age 6.  And people wonder why in 1983, they had never heard of autism or severe peanut allergies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a doctor</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-12324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a doctor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-12324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://holfordwatch.info/off-topic/#comment-12329&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Off-topic&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://holfordwatch.info/off-topic/#comment-12329" rel="nofollow">Off-topic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We Feared &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-10402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We Feared &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-10402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it may look as if Holford is not entirely forthcoming about the actual significance of the Poling case although HolfordWatch has previously discussed the flaws in Holford&#8217;s thinking on this [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it may look as if Holford is not entirely forthcoming about the actual significance of the Poling case although HolfordWatch has previously discussed the flaws in Holford&#8217;s thinking on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ()</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/09/holford-tries-to-do-vaccination-science/comment-page-2/#comment-10210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[()]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=402#comment-10210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no real proof that the vaccination caused autism. Am i right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no real proof that the vaccination caused autism. Am i right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

