<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We Feared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford on Andrew Wakefield: He Needs to Issue an Update &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-15013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford on Andrew Wakefield: He Needs to Issue an Update &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-15013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Former Visiting Professor Patrick Holford even depends on Wakefield&#8217;s research to argue for a protracted vaccination schedule of selected, single jabs, omitting some, such as whooping cough, altogether. Holford is prepared to lend lip-service to the need for measles vaccination although strongly hinting that all any child needs is a strong immune system and vitamin A. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Former Visiting Professor Patrick Holford even depends on Wakefield&#8217;s research to argue for a protracted vaccination schedule of selected, single jabs, omitting some, such as whooping cough, altogether. Holford is prepared to lend lip-service to the need for measles vaccination although strongly hinting that all any child needs is a strong immune system and vitamin A. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wakefield Responds to Brian Deer: Summary, &#8220;I regret nothing&#8230;Single jabs are the way ahead&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-14743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Wakefield Responds to Brian Deer: Summary, &#8220;I regret nothing&#8230;Single jabs are the way ahead&#8221; &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-14743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Even Former Visiting Professor Patrick Holford is prepared to lend lip-service to the need for measles vaccination although strongly hinting that all any child needs is a strong immune system and vitamin A. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even Former Visiting Professor Patrick Holford is prepared to lend lip-service to the need for measles vaccination although strongly hinting that all any child needs is a strong immune system and vitamin A. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-12550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-12550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One other point...&quot;Hannah Poling has a relevant mitochondrial disorder and that her experience should not be generalised to that of other children&quot;...

Up to 1 in 50 children can have this condition. It is therefore not rare but rarely diagnosed before vaccination occurs. It is also a fairly recent discovery but that doesn&#039;t negate the fact that it could be responsible for the thousands of children whose parents believe their Autism is linked to vaccines. You are dismissing any causal link by stating the causal link! That doesn&#039;t make sciantific sense. There should be mandatory health checks for such conditions before routine vaccinations commence don&#039;t you think? Or are a few thousand damaged children a year an acceptable consequence?

&lt;b&gt;Admin edit: Just because you have read that from Kirby et al it doesn&#039;t make it true. You are long on assertion, short on fact.&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other point&#8230;&#8221;Hannah Poling has a relevant mitochondrial disorder and that her experience should not be generalised to that of other children&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Up to 1 in 50 children can have this condition. It is therefore not rare but rarely diagnosed before vaccination occurs. It is also a fairly recent discovery but that doesn&#8217;t negate the fact that it could be responsible for the thousands of children whose parents believe their Autism is linked to vaccines. You are dismissing any causal link by stating the causal link! That doesn&#8217;t make sciantific sense. There should be mandatory health checks for such conditions before routine vaccinations commence don&#8217;t you think? Or are a few thousand damaged children a year an acceptable consequence?</p>
<p><b>Admin edit: Just because you have read that from Kirby et al it doesn&#8217;t make it true. You are long on assertion, short on fact.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-12549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-12549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irim, could your mother describe what vaccine injured children&#039;s lives are like? I can tell you...please see my post in off-topics. It may help you understand why some people make hard thought earnest decisions about vaccinations, not quick fix blah blah decisions like the irresponsible parents that we must be.

&lt;b&gt;Admin edit: so could many people. What about the parents and people who post at &lt;a href=&quot;http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;LB/RB&lt;/a&gt; who have very different experiences and opinions to yours?&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irim, could your mother describe what vaccine injured children&#8217;s lives are like? I can tell you&#8230;please see my post in off-topics. It may help you understand why some people make hard thought earnest decisions about vaccinations, not quick fix blah blah decisions like the irresponsible parents that we must be.</p>
<p><b>Admin edit: so could many people. What about the parents and people who post at <a href="http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">LB/RB</a> who have very different experiences and opinions to yours?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cath</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-11745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-11745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Admin edit: moved to &lt;a href=&quot;http://holfordwatch.info/off-topic/#comment-11747&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;off-topic&lt;/a&gt; as it didn&#039;t comment on this post.&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Admin edit: moved to <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/off-topic/#comment-11747" rel="nofollow">off-topic</a> as it didn&#8217;t comment on this post.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford and Aluminium in Vaccines &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-10626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford and Aluminium in Vaccines &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-10626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that he enhances their reputation and scientific credibility. We are taking a multi-part look at Holford&#8217;s advice in &#8220;Vaccinations: what every parent needs to know&#8221; in 100%health Newsletter, No. 46, July 2008, pp. 5-8. We focus on Holford&#8217;s description of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that he enhances their reputation and scientific credibility. We are taking a multi-part look at Holford&#8217;s advice in &#8220;Vaccinations: what every parent needs to know&#8221; in 100%health Newsletter, No. 46, July 2008, pp. 5-8. We focus on Holford&#8217;s description of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-10492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-10492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Irim - You&#039;re right. I wouldn&#039;t wish anyone to discover the wretchedness of preventable childhood illnesses for their children and this means that the intimate knowledge of how devastating this can be has faded in the UK - unlike your mother&#039;s practice.

In the UK there is a tendency to think that MMR has only been available since the 1990s because that is when it was introduced here - unlike the US where it was available from the 1970s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Irim &#8211; You&#8217;re right. I wouldn&#8217;t wish anyone to discover the wretchedness of preventable childhood illnesses for their children and this means that the intimate knowledge of how devastating this can be has faded in the UK &#8211; unlike your mother&#8217;s practice.</p>
<p>In the UK there is a tendency to think that MMR has only been available since the 1990s because that is when it was introduced here &#8211; unlike the US where it was available from the 1970s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irim</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-10481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-10481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this is veering away slightly from the topic, but I think a huge part of the problem is that school science is failing us.

Not everyone is going to be a scientist, that&#039;s a given. HOWEVER, everyone is going to make decisions ABOUT science in their lifetime: whether it&#039;s about their health, or whether to vote for embryonic stem cell research, or how to read food labels. 

We need a thread in school science that teaches people to do that. Kids need to learn what good scientific method looks like, how to ask the right questions, how to follow an argument, where to look for the information they need to make an informed decision, how to weigh the ethics of a new scientific discovery. If the general populace had known how to ask the right questions, Wakefield would have been outed before he did all that damage.

The first thing people in their late 30s would have thought was, &quot;Wait. *I* received an MMR jab. It has been out since ca. 1970. SURELY, had there been a statistically significant increase in autism, SOMEONE would have noticed it over the last 30-odd years. Over to you, Dr Wakefield. Care to answer that?&quot;

We&#039;ve become a culture of &#039;quick fixes&#039; and style over substance - the anathema of good science. That&#039;s why people like Patrick Holford, Gillian McKeith, etc. have been allowed such free rein - they promise simple, novel fixes. No need to look beneath the surface or consider multiple factors. It&#039;s the &#039;guru complex&#039; - someone else is telling me what to do and responsibility for my life is taken away from me.

It doesn&#039;t excuse them, by any stretch. But we the people shouldn&#039;t be excused for abdicating our responsibility to look at what&#039;s really going on rather than accepting something this dangerous at face value.

People need to take a really hard look at what life was like before vaccines - very few remember polio and measle epidemics and the horrific complications and deaths that can ensue. If what I&#039;m hearing is correct, we&#039;re already well below herd immunity levels - minimum is 85% and for something like pertussis, it&#039;s closer to 95%, IIRC.

Please, folks, make sure your children receive their jabs - if you need to be convinced, I&#039;m sure my mother, who is a paediatrician who has practiced in Pakistan, could give you some graphic descriptions that would make you forget anything Holford and Wakefield have to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is veering away slightly from the topic, but I think a huge part of the problem is that school science is failing us.</p>
<p>Not everyone is going to be a scientist, that&#8217;s a given. HOWEVER, everyone is going to make decisions ABOUT science in their lifetime: whether it&#8217;s about their health, or whether to vote for embryonic stem cell research, or how to read food labels. </p>
<p>We need a thread in school science that teaches people to do that. Kids need to learn what good scientific method looks like, how to ask the right questions, how to follow an argument, where to look for the information they need to make an informed decision, how to weigh the ethics of a new scientific discovery. If the general populace had known how to ask the right questions, Wakefield would have been outed before he did all that damage.</p>
<p>The first thing people in their late 30s would have thought was, &#8220;Wait. *I* received an MMR jab. It has been out since ca. 1970. SURELY, had there been a statistically significant increase in autism, SOMEONE would have noticed it over the last 30-odd years. Over to you, Dr Wakefield. Care to answer that?&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve become a culture of &#8216;quick fixes&#8217; and style over substance &#8211; the anathema of good science. That&#8217;s why people like Patrick Holford, Gillian McKeith, etc. have been allowed such free rein &#8211; they promise simple, novel fixes. No need to look beneath the surface or consider multiple factors. It&#8217;s the &#8216;guru complex&#8217; &#8211; someone else is telling me what to do and responsibility for my life is taken away from me.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t excuse them, by any stretch. But we the people shouldn&#8217;t be excused for abdicating our responsibility to look at what&#8217;s really going on rather than accepting something this dangerous at face value.</p>
<p>People need to take a really hard look at what life was like before vaccines &#8211; very few remember polio and measle epidemics and the horrific complications and deaths that can ensue. If what I&#8217;m hearing is correct, we&#8217;re already well below herd immunity levels &#8211; minimum is 85% and for something like pertussis, it&#8217;s closer to 95%, IIRC.</p>
<p>Please, folks, make sure your children receive their jabs &#8211; if you need to be convinced, I&#8217;m sure my mother, who is a paediatrician who has practiced in Pakistan, could give you some graphic descriptions that would make you forget anything Holford and Wakefield have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Holford Claims There Is No Need to Vaccinate for Whooping Cough &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-10447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Holford Claims There Is No Need to Vaccinate for Whooping Cough &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-10447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Off-Topic        &#8592; Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We&#160;Feared [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Off-Topic        &larr; Patrick Holford and His Recommendations for Vaccines: As Canard-Stuffed As We&nbsp;Feared [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/07/14/patrick-holford-and-his-recommendations-for-vaccines-as-canard-stuffed-as-we-feared/comment-page-1/#comment-10425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-10425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Possibly philosophically completely illiterate but it strikes me that holfordesque selective quoting - leaving out complicated facts which don&#039;t sit well with one&#039;s preferred explanation -  could be described as a form of, er, reductionism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly philosophically completely illiterate but it strikes me that holfordesque selective quoting &#8211; leaving out complicated facts which don&#8217;t sit well with one&#8217;s preferred explanation &#8211;  could be described as a form of, er, reductionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

