<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supporting Ben Goldacre: Could Stephen Fry Be More of a Mensch?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truly Much Bogosity &#171; Dr Aust&#8217;s Spleen</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-19530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truly Much Bogosity &#171; Dr Aust&#8217;s Spleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 20:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-19530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] would be available for benefit gigs, and I reckon we can also count on Dave Gorman. Wonder if Stephen Fry would like to do one too? Or Tim [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would be available for benefit gigs, and I reckon we can also count on Dave Gorman. Wonder if Stephen Fry would like to do one too? Or Tim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etty</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-16327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[etty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-16327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[stephen fry. witty, smart, urbane and generous.

and that accent. what is not to love.

i hope that he and ben goldacre collaborate on something when stephen is next in the UK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stephen fry. witty, smart, urbane and generous.</p>
<p>and that accent. what is not to love.</p>
<p>i hope that he and ben goldacre collaborate on something when stephen is next in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Barnett, LBC and Global Radio, MMR Segment 7 Jan 2009 and the Ben Goldacre Coverage: Part 2 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-14795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeni Barnett, LBC and Global Radio, MMR Segment 7 Jan 2009 and the Ben Goldacre Coverage: Part 2 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-14795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stephen Fry has-wonderfully-been Stephen Fry. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stephen Fry has-wonderfully-been Stephen Fry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warhelmet</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-14790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warhelmet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-14790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter? No, no and thrice no!

Whereas Stephen Fry has X many thousand followers waiting for gilded poop to emergence from his creative anus, in reality Twitter is dem bad stuff. Worse than Facewank.

Actually, I think Fry is quite witty and clever. I just wish that he&#039;d use his other media channels as well. We shall wait for the QI special on homeopathy and other pseudo-science or him road-testing a magnetic bracelet for one of his printed meejah columns.

Most internet social networking represents a dead end. Friends Reunited anyone?

&lt;b&gt;Admin edit: I like the idea of an entire QI on homeopathy, dowsing, kinesiology and pseudo-science. If rationality won&#039;t convert people then maybe a more lighthearted approach might.&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter? No, no and thrice no!</p>
<p>Whereas Stephen Fry has X many thousand followers waiting for gilded poop to emergence from his creative anus, in reality Twitter is dem bad stuff. Worse than Facewank.</p>
<p>Actually, I think Fry is quite witty and clever. I just wish that he&#8217;d use his other media channels as well. We shall wait for the QI special on homeopathy and other pseudo-science or him road-testing a magnetic bracelet for one of his printed meejah columns.</p>
<p>Most internet social networking represents a dead end. Friends Reunited anyone?</p>
<p><b>Admin edit: I like the idea of an entire QI on homeopathy, dowsing, kinesiology and pseudo-science. If rationality won&#8217;t convert people then maybe a more lighthearted approach might.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Barnett and the Missing Blog Posts About MMR Segment on LBC Radio &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-14785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeni Barnett and the Missing Blog Posts About MMR Segment on LBC Radio &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-14785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Holford&#160;Myths        &#8592; Supporting Ben Goldacre: Could Stephen Fry Be More of a&#160;Mensch? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Holford&nbsp;Myths        &larr; Supporting Ben Goldacre: Could Stephen Fry Be More of a&nbsp;Mensch? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Pertsovich</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-14783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Svetlana Pertsovich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-14783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real circus! ;)

But I wonder it will help to solve a problem of measles epidemic in Britain, eh? It seems the talk was just about this subject, if I  rightly understood...

&lt;b&gt;Admin edit: interesting point. However, if giving the issue of misinformation in mainstream media allows better coverage of why people are annoyed that so many others aren&#039;t aware of the decent science the underpins vaccine safety then the outcome might be a better uptake of immunisations. 

Who knows?&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real circus! ;)</p>
<p>But I wonder it will help to solve a problem of measles epidemic in Britain, eh? It seems the talk was just about this subject, if I  rightly understood&#8230;</p>
<p><b>Admin edit: interesting point. However, if giving the issue of misinformation in mainstream media allows better coverage of why people are annoyed that so many others aren&#8217;t aware of the decent science the underpins vaccine safety then the outcome might be a better uptake of immunisations. </p>
<p>Who knows?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvnutrix</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-14772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dvnutrix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-14772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Give your self over to the power of the Fry - it&#039;s Twitter, Apple and Light Savers, what&#039;s not to love.

OT, at some point in his career, Stephen Fry might do another recording of LOTR to replace the current Ian McKellen one (excellent though that is) - he would be very good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give your self over to the power of the Fry &#8211; it&#8217;s Twitter, Apple and Light Savers, what&#8217;s not to love.</p>
<p>OT, at some point in his career, Stephen Fry might do another recording of LOTR to replace the current Ian McKellen one (excellent though that is) &#8211; he would be very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr* T</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/02/10/supporting-ben-goldacre-could-stephen-fry-be-more-of-a-mensch/comment-page-1/#comment-14769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr* T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=3032#comment-14769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Honourable Mr Fry has about 160,000 people follow his Twitter, so I guess that&#039;s why Positive had to lock down the site!

SF has a lot of power at his fingertips, I&#039;m glad he is using his power for good [LOTR nonsense removed]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Honourable Mr Fry has about 160,000 people follow his Twitter, so I guess that&#8217;s why Positive had to lock down the site!</p>
<p>SF has a lot of power at his fingertips, I&#8217;m glad he is using his power for good [LOTR nonsense removed]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

