<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holford demonstrates why online health advice can be problematic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2009/10/24/holford-demonstrates-why-online-health-advice-can-be-problematic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/10/24/holford-demonstrates-why-online-health-advice-can-be-problematic/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BANT: A Profile &#171; Stuff And Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/10/24/holford-demonstrates-why-online-health-advice-can-be-problematic/comment-page-1/#comment-31593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BANT: A Profile &#171; Stuff And Nonsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=4745#comment-31593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] BANT &#8211; the professional association of nutritional therapists failed even to respond. In the original post that detailed Holford Watch&#8217;s concerns, the bloggers wrote that they hoped that BANT would [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BANT &#8211; the professional association of nutritional therapists failed even to respond. In the original post that detailed Holford Watch&#8217;s concerns, the bloggers wrote that they hoped that BANT would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BANT fail to reply to complaint from 25/10/09 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/10/24/holford-demonstrates-why-online-health-advice-can-be-problematic/comment-page-1/#comment-25980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BANT fail to reply to complaint from 25/10/09 &#171; Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=4745#comment-25980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fail to reply to complaint from&#160;25/10/09  Jump to Comments  As noted here, I e-mailed the British Association for Nutritional Therapy (BANT) to complain about some of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fail to reply to complaint from&nbsp;25/10/09  Jump to Comments  As noted here, I e-mailed the British Association for Nutritional Therapy (BANT) to complain about some of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

