<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BANT fail to reply to complaint from 25/10/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/2009/11/25/bant-fail-to-reply-to-complaint-from-251009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/11/25/bant-fail-to-reply-to-complaint-from-251009/</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BANT: A Profile &#171; Stuff And Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/11/25/bant-fail-to-reply-to-complaint-from-251009/comment-page-1/#comment-31592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BANT: A Profile &#171; Stuff And Nonsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=4770#comment-31592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Here, Holford Watch reveal the outcome of a complaint to BANT &#8211; the professional association of nutritional therapists failed even to respond. In the original post that detailed Holford Watch&#8217;s concerns, the bloggers wrote that they hoped that BANT would take &#8220;prompt, effective and transparent action&#8221; on this issue. The post detailing the lack of response appeared one month following the initial blogpost. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here, Holford Watch reveal the outcome of a complaint to BANT &#8211; the professional association of nutritional therapists failed even to respond. In the original post that detailed Holford Watch&#8217;s concerns, the bloggers wrote that they hoped that BANT would take &#8220;prompt, effective and transparent action&#8221; on this issue. The post detailing the lack of response appeared one month following the initial blogpost. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdc325</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2009/11/25/bant-fail-to-reply-to-complaint-from-251009/comment-page-1/#comment-25985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdc325]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=4770#comment-25985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s very frustrating when an organisation fails to respond (or fails to respond promptly) - and it is also very disappointing when it is an organisation that claims to promote high standards of practice and integrity that has failed to respond promptly to a complaint that relates to the practice of one of their members/fellows.

I have had problems getting responses from a University (until I received some useful advice regarding the Freedom of Information Act, and put in a FOIA request), a Chiropractic Association, an alternative medicine &quot;Research Institute&quot; and (after I had asked a question in the wake of the Rath affair) I actually had some difficulty getting a response from organisations and individuals involved in Nutritional Therapy.

ION, EHPM, and Patrick Holford all remained &lt;a href=&quot;http://jdc325.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/silence-is-not-golden-more-on-rath-and-the-nutrition-industry/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;silent&lt;/a&gt;, while (ironically, given the above blog post) the only response I &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; get was from &lt;a href=&quot;http://jdc325.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/bant-no-opinion/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BANT&lt;/a&gt; - who stated that they had no opinion to offer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very frustrating when an organisation fails to respond (or fails to respond promptly) &#8211; and it is also very disappointing when it is an organisation that claims to promote high standards of practice and integrity that has failed to respond promptly to a complaint that relates to the practice of one of their members/fellows.</p>
<p>I have had problems getting responses from a University (until I received some useful advice regarding the Freedom of Information Act, and put in a FOIA request), a Chiropractic Association, an alternative medicine &#8220;Research Institute&#8221; and (after I had asked a question in the wake of the Rath affair) I actually had some difficulty getting a response from organisations and individuals involved in Nutritional Therapy.</p>
<p>ION, EHPM, and Patrick Holford all remained <a href="http://jdc325.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/silence-is-not-golden-more-on-rath-and-the-nutrition-industry/" rel="nofollow">silent</a>, while (ironically, given the above blog post) the only response I <i>did</i> get was from <a href="http://jdc325.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/bant-no-opinion/" rel="nofollow">BANT</a> &#8211; who stated that they had no opinion to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

