<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science &#187; allergies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://holfordwatch.info/category/allergies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://holfordwatch.info</link>
	<description>The truth about Patrick Holford, media nutritionist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='holfordwatch.info' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://holfordwatch.info/osd.xml" title="Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://holfordwatch.info/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Holford gives poor advice about dietary restrictions for children. Again</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/12/05/holford-dietary-restrictions-children/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/12/05/holford-dietary-restrictions-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonhw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elimination diets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for the brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for the brain foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPSDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intolerances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/?p=2141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Food for the Brain modified some advice on dietary exclusions for children &#8211; when we pointed out that such changes should be implemented under medical and/or dietetic supervision. We were therefore disappointed to see iAfrica reporting Holford&#8217;s advice &#8230; <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/12/05/holford-dietary-restrictions-children/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=2141&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/12/05/holford-dietary-restrictions-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/81fcec5d60583eeb8c289a73084a16de?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonhw</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>You and Yours on Which? Investigation into Food Intolerance Tests</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/26/you-and-yours-on-which-investigation-into-food-intolerance-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/26/you-and-yours-on-which-investigation-into-food-intolerance-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvnutrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorktest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPSDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge Nutritional Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Which?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=1326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Radio 4's You and Yours ran an intereresting segment about the Which? investigation into food intolerance testing. Dr Mike Walker of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences participated and attempted to defend the scientific basis for the IgG food intolerance test. However, he argued that the IgG food intolerance test is not diagnostic of food intolerance. Oddly enough, YorkTest have also made similar statements. Somebody should send Allergy UK and Patrick Holford the memo about this. <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/26/you-and-yours-on-which-investigation-into-food-intolerance-tests/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=1326&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/26/you-and-yours-on-which-investigation-into-food-intolerance-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dc9aef705677f1c99432d1858480ef98?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dvnutrix</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>YorkTest, Hardman &amp; Hart: there&#8217;s a difference between the BMJ and Nutrition and Food Science</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/24/yorktest-hardman-hart-theres-a-difference-between-the-bmj-and-nutrition-and-food-science/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/24/yorktest-hardman-hart-theres-a-difference-between-the-bmj-and-nutrition-and-food-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvnutrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorktest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPSDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition and Food Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=1238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A YorkTest brochure about their IgG food intolerance tests states that there are "25 years of the highest quality 'double blind' clinical trials that have been published in numerous peer reviewed medical journals, including the British Medical Journal". No, there aren't and they have never published in the BMJ. Chutzpah or mistake? <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/24/yorktest-hardman-hart-theres-a-difference-between-the-bmj-and-nutrition-and-food-science/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=1238&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/24/yorktest-hardman-hart-theres-a-difference-between-the-bmj-and-nutrition-and-food-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dc9aef705677f1c99432d1858480ef98?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dvnutrix</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://holfordwatch.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/yorktest.jpg?w=128" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">A surprising mistake? </media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://holfordwatch.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/yorktest1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">A surprising mistake?</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which?, YorkTest and Cambridge Nutritional Sciences Ltd</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/21/which-yorktest-and-cambridge-nutritional-sciences-ltd/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/21/which-yorktest-and-cambridge-nutritional-sciences-ltd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvnutrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food sensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorktest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPSDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge Nutritional Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge Nutritional Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chutzpah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Which?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Which? investigation into commonly available tests for food intolerance reported that the tests returned inconsistent results and flagged up health problems that don’t exist. Predictably, both YorkTest and Cambridge Nutritional Sciences have objected to the findings although it isn't clear what their grounds are. YorkTest in particular demonstrates a degree of chutzpah that we typically associate with former Visiting Professor Patrick Holford. <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/21/which-yorktest-and-cambridge-nutritional-sciences-ltd/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=1177&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/08/21/which-yorktest-and-cambridge-nutritional-sciences-ltd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dc9aef705677f1c99432d1858480ef98?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dvnutrix</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://holfordwatch.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/webready-5.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">YorkTest claims that Which? describes IgG as &#34;validated scientific test&#34;</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford is an ex-Professor: he has resigned his Visiting Professorship at Teesside.  UPDATE: Teesside&#8217;s Cactus Clinic also ceases to operate</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/06/06/patrick-holford-is-an-ex-professor-he-has-resigned-his-visiting-professorship-at-teesside/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/06/06/patrick-holford-is-an-ex-professor-he-has-resigned-his-visiting-professorship-at-teesside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonhw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADHD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Teesside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cactus Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resigned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teesside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visiting Professor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Holford has resigned his visiting professorship at the University of Teesside. The Cactus Clinic has ceased to operate: this is unfortunate for the parents who benefited from its services. However, the nutritional assessment programme with its emphasis on unproven tests such as hair mineral analysis and IgG blood tests for food intolerance was not pursuing an evidence-based approach and it is unsettling that this was considered appropriate with such a vulnerable clientele. <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/06/06/patrick-holford-is-an-ex-professor-he-has-resigned-his-visiting-professorship-at-teesside/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=463&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/06/06/patrick-holford-is-an-ex-professor-he-has-resigned-his-visiting-professorship-at-teesside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/81fcec5d60583eeb8c289a73084a16de?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonhw</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford and Natural Products magazine get things badly wrong about nutrition and allergy</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/05/28/patrick-holford-and-natural-products-magazine-get-things-badly-wrong-about-nutrition-and-allergy/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/05/28/patrick-holford-and-natural-products-magazine-get-things-badly-wrong-about-nutrition-and-allergy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonhw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Teesside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hayfever]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post &#8211; to note that Prof Patrick Holford of Teesside University has a pretty terrible article on hayfever on the Natural Products website. At a quick glance, a couple of things stand out. Holford says he had &#8230; <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/05/28/patrick-holford-and-natural-products-magazine-get-things-badly-wrong-about-nutrition-and-allergy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=454&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/05/28/patrick-holford-and-natural-products-magazine-get-things-badly-wrong-about-nutrition-and-allergy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/81fcec5d60583eeb8c289a73084a16de?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonhw</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BANT and Conflict of Interest: YorkTest and Similar Commission</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/21/bant-and-conflict-of-interest-yorktest-and-similar-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/21/bant-and-conflict-of-interest-yorktest-and-similar-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvnutrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biocare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foodSCAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homocysteine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liver check test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional therapists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorktest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.wordpress.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of BANT are allowed to accept commission on lab tests and supplements and are under no obligation to declare these to the client; unlike the financial services industry where such practices are frowned upon. Is this acceptable? Particularly when nutritional therapists frequently accuse medical professionals of such conflicts of interest. <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/21/bant-and-conflict-of-interest-yorktest-and-similar-commission/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=414&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/04/21/bant-and-conflict-of-interest-yorktest-and-similar-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dc9aef705677f1c99432d1858480ef98?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dvnutrix</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food for the Brain Child Survey: The Promotion</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/08/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-the-promotion/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/08/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-the-promotion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvnutrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for the brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorktest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/08/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-the-promotion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Patrick Holford and Drew Fobbester co-authored the Food for the Brain Child Report 2007. The report was covered widely and largely uncritically in the media. It was presented as a snapshot of the dietary status and mental health of children although it is not a representative sample of UK children and that there are severe limitations to what may be claimed for the study. Holford Watch is willing to make a contribution to the critical appraisal of this report; especially when some authorities express the pious hope that it should be read by people who might influence public policy. <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/08/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-the-promotion/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=295&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2008/01/08/food-for-the-brain-child-survey-the-promotion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.foodforthebrain.org/FFTB_on_GMTV_LK.wmv" length="34048572" type="video/x-ms-wmv" />
<enclosure url="http://www.foodforthebrain.org/FFTB_on_GMTV_LK.mov" length="37880421" type="video/quicktime" />
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dc9aef705677f1c99432d1858480ef98?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dvnutrix</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Holford Still Advocates IgG Testing for Food Allergies</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/18/patrick-holford-still-advocates-igg-testing-for-food-allergies/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/18/patrick-holford-still-advocates-igg-testing-for-food-allergies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dvnutrix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food sensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hometesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lactose intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick holford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scadding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorktest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IgG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[York Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/18/patrick-holford-still-advocates-igg-testing-for-food-allergies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University and Head of Science and Education at Biocare frequently upbraids professionals and researchers for what he perceives as their lack of up-to-date research. Holford&#8217;s 100%health newsletter for November 2007 is full of the usual &#8230; <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/18/patrick-holford-still-advocates-igg-testing-for-food-allergies/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=283&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/12/18/patrick-holford-still-advocates-igg-testing-for-food-allergies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dc9aef705677f1c99432d1858480ef98?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dvnutrix</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holford in the Scotsman: another dubious claim about autism</title>
		<link>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/03/holford-in-the-scotsman-another-dubious-claim-about-autism/</link>
		<comments>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/03/holford-in-the-scotsman-another-dubious-claim-about-autism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jonhw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for the brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food intolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gluten intolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/03/holford-in-the-scotsman-another-dubious-claim-about-autism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought that &#8211; when the Scotsman published Blissett&#8217;s dire article on Holford a while after the Standard &#8211; it was just letting its standards slip, and running a poor-quality cast-off from the London media. However, having taken a closer &#8230; <a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/03/holford-in-the-scotsman-another-dubious-claim-about-autism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=holfordwatch.info&amp;blog=1336499&amp;post=258&amp;subd=holfordwatch&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://holfordwatch.info/2007/11/03/holford-in-the-scotsman-another-dubious-claim-about-autism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/81fcec5d60583eeb8c289a73084a16de?s=96&#38;d=identicon" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jonhw</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
