Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Entries categorized as ‘Food for the brain foundation’

Post #350: “If you think I have been overly critical, I would invite you to notice that they win”

September 21, 2008 · 19 Comments

This is our 350th post on HolfordWatch. Over the course of these posts, we have found a number of inaccuracies in Holford’s self-presentation and many serious errors in his work. These errors overwhelmingly remain uncorrected or inadequately corrected, and Holford has failed to respond to almost all of the issues raised (what responses we have had from Holford are not at all convincing). However, we would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Patrick Holford: despite embarrassingly poor-quality work, an inaccurate CV and very public demolitions of his research, Patrick Holford has achieved a great deal in his career, in academia and in the media.

While we have been running this blog, Holford managed to sell his Health Products for Life business to Biocare (owned by Neutrahealth, who 30% owned by Elder Pharmaceuticals) for £464,000, and currently works as Head of Science and Education at Biocare. We have ethical quibbles about taking money from the pharmaceutical industry - we don’t do it - but careers in this industry are competitive, and Holford should be congratulated for getting so much money from Biocare (and thus, indirectly, from Elder Pharmaceuticals).

Holford should also be congratulated for having his application to be a visiting professor at Teesside University approved (more…)

Categories: Ben Goldacre · Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · University of Teesside · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , ,

My (Paid) Friend Says This Product Is Really Good: FFTB and Cherry-Picking

May 2, 2008 · 10 Comments

Visiting Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University and the Food for the Brain Foundation (FFTB) are promoting a very well-thought plan whereby food and supplement manufacturers will give them money in exchange for the endorsement of their products. Now, charities have to get their money from somewhere, so isn’t that all very sensible? (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holford · University of Teesside · children · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Holford tries to respond to questions raised by BBC documentary. He fails.

March 31, 2008 · 9 Comments

Cat is jumping across a gap in a kitchen but will not reach its target; the caption reads 'About to Fail'

Having just posted about Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University’s curious relationship with the mainstream media, we were fascinated to see Patrick Holford responding to the Radio 4 programme: The Rise of the Lifestyle Nutritionists. From what he writes, it sounds like he does feature in Part 2 of the series. I haven’t heard Part 2 yet - it’s scheduled to be broadcast on March 31 at 8pm - but it’s already clear that Holford fails to offer an adequate response to the questions raised. His responses range from dodging the questions asked, to answering while giving a clearly incorrect answer, and so gobsmackingly wrong that they even fail to qualify as wrong. Now I’m really looking forward to the radio programme: Holford digs himself in deep enough without having heard the programme, but I’m sure that the BBC’s research skills will allow them to provide a JCB or two to join Holford in his hole. (more…)

Categories: Ben Goldacre · Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · allergy · anaphylaxis · food intolerance · omega 3 · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 3

January 25, 2008 · 6 Comments

Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University (and also Head of Science and Education at Biocare) and Drew Fobbester are joint researchers and authors of the Food for the Brain Child Survey, September 2007 (pdf). This is the third of three Holford Watch posts in which we explain why the literature overview in the FFTB Child Survey is inadequate: some of the claims made in the review are not supported by relevant references or studies of sufficient quality. Part 1 discusses the claims relating to supplements and children’s diet. Part 2 examines the claims made for the benefit of a balanced glycaemic load diet for children. For Part 3, we discuss the claims for the alleged incidence of food sensitivities and gluten sensitivity.
(more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · food intolerance · health · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Food for the Brain: Child Survey: Review Part 2

January 17, 2008 · 9 Comments

Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University (and also Head of Science and Education at Biocare) and Drew Fobbester are joint researchers and authors of the Food for the Brain Child Survey, September 2007 (pdf). This is the second of three Holford Watch posts in which we explain why the literature overview in the FFTB Child Survey is inadequate: some of the claims made in the review are not supported by relevant references or studies of sufficient quality. Part 1 discussed the claims relating to supplements and children’s diet. Part 2 examines the claims made for the benefit of a balanced glycaemic load diet for children.
(more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holford · children · food intolerance · food sensitivity · gluten intolerance · glycaemic load · glycemic load · intelligence · intolerance · nutrition · patrick holford · referenciness · truthiness
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Food for the Brain Child Survey: Review Part 1

January 10, 2008 · 16 Comments

Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University (and also Head of Science and Education at Biocare) and Drew Fobbester are joint researchers and authors of the Food for the Brain Child Survey, September 2007 (pdf). Holford Watch will use three posts to explain why the literature overview in the FFTB Child Survey is inadequate: some of the claims made in the review are not supported by relevant references or studies of sufficient quality.
(more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · children · health · nutrition · patrick holford · supplements
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Patrick Holford, Food for the Brain and Equazen

December 12, 2007 · 12 Comments

Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University and Head of Science and Education at Biocare has an unerring sense for his endorsements (see, e.g., the qLink with the unconnected coil and the dLan that may enhance your exposure to EMR and YorkTest, the IgG food intolerance tests criticised by both the House of Lords and the ASA). Holford managed to procure some useful backing for the Food for the Brain project. One of the companies is Equazen. Equazen donated essential fat supplements to school projects. With an astonishing sense of inevitability, Equazen has just been criticised by the ASA and found to be unable to substantiate some of its advertising claims: e.g. “A Hi-EPA fish oil formula that may help maintain concentration levels and healthy brain development”. (more…)

Categories: Ben Goldacre · Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holford · fish · omega 3 · supplements
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Patrick Holford Calls Some Children Stupid and Claims That Some Foods Make Them Thicker

September 12, 2007 · 64 Comments

cat looks endearingly vulnerable; caption reads Go cry, emo cat

Prof Patrick Holford is somewhat sensitive to remarks about himself, his qualifications and scientific rigour. It is the more remarkable given that his own Food for the Brain (FFTB) organisation has no qualms about labelling children as “stupid”. The press release for the recently released FFTB survey trumpeted (reproduced as is, errors are theirs):

BRITAIN’S BIGGEST EVER SURVEY OF OVER 10,000 CHILDREN REVEALS FOODS THAT MAKE CHILDRENSMART … OR STUPID

Outstanding sensitivity; thank goodness that they decided to perform a bodyswerve and avoid sensationalising their findings or adversely labelling some of the participants. (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holford · children · nutrition · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Patrick Holford and Chineham Primary School: Where does the praise belong?

July 24, 2007 · 2 Comments


Otter with ice-bucket

Patrick Holford is tremendously proud of what he believes Food for the Brain (FFTB) accomplished during their collaboration with Chineham Park Primary School. So much so that, to the fair-minded, it seems as if he is perilously close to neglecting to acknowledge the tremendous achievements that the Chineham Park Primary School had made prior to the implementation of the project.

Of course, Patrick Holford is a byword for accidental misrepresentation in some parts. Read on

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holfordism · ION · institute for optimum nutrition · institute of optimum nutrition · patrick holford · supplements

Food for the Brain Results on Trevor Macdonald: Part 3

July 13, 2007 · 1 Comment

Bronze sculpture of a figure with a migraine by Jose SacalPatrick Holford seems to have the same effect on numbers that some people claim to have on electronic gadgets; they scramble in his presence or even that of people associated with him. That is the only possible explanation for one of the worse data summaries/commentaries that I have ever seen: Dr David Woodhouse on the subgroup analysis performed as part of the Chineham Park Primary School FFTB project that will be featured in this evening’s Trevor Macdonald programme. I kept expecting a Shirley Bassey audio file to blare out a bravura performance of:

Nobody does it like me! If there’s a wrong way to say it - A wrong way to play it - Nobody does it like me! - If there’s a wrong way to do it - A right way to screw it up - Nobody does it like me

Read on

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holford · TOVA · patrick holford · supplements