Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science

Entries categorized as ‘Food for the brain’

Canard-ridden Holford interview in National Health Executive Review

November 17, 2008 · 16 Comments

Food for the Brain seem very pleased about an embarrassingly poor quality interview with Holford in National Health Executive (PDF): a journal targeted at senior health managers. Food for the Brain have sent out an e-mail to their mailing list to proudly plug this piece. However, the questions are frankly rather odd, and Holford is allowed:

  • to bask in the glory of a Associate Parliamentary Forum report on diet, mental health and behaviour (despite the fact that the report failed to mention his work or that of Food for the Brain)
  • to cast aspersions on the nutritional knowledge of qualified health professionals
  • to accuse healthcare professionals of being biased against nutrition due to the role of pharmaceutical industry funding although Holford himself works for a company part-owned by Elder Pharmaceuticals, and accepted £464,000 from Neutrahealth.

It also looks like the NHE takes pay-to-print articles which might or might not explain the appearance of an article that reads like an extended advertorial for Food for the Brain and Holford. (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Holford · patrick holford · supplements
Tagged: , , , ,

Who Wrote About Food for the Brain in The Economist: Conflict of Interest?

November 16, 2008 · 23 Comments

In a recent burst of autobiographical disclosure and outrage I posted The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion.

I can’t begin to describe my disappointment that The Economist somehow veered from its olympian standards and published a piece of such gob-smacking credulity that I was left waiting for the volte-face punchline that didn’t come. More extraordinary is the fact that The Economist links to Food for the Brain (FFTB) and lends its gravitas to that organisation by carrying this article about its recent conference (you may recall the awfulness of the lamentable Food for the Brain Child Survey 2007, details in further reading).

Treatment on a plate displays shoddy scholarship that is a strong warning sign that there is either a substantial misunderstanding or an undisclosed conflict of interest: this is not typical of The Economist…which makes this article all the more dispiriting.

Thanks to an impeccable source, we have learned the identity of the writer. (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Holford · patrick holford · supplements
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

The Economist: The End of a Childhood Illusion

November 5, 2008 · 18 Comments

When I was 12-years old I had a run of history and science projects that absorbed all my interest and exhausted the resources of my local library. Inexplicably, I was granted in-library reading privileges at the University Library. I was free to consult not only books but academic journals and popular reviews. For the first time, I saw publications that I had only read about: London Review of Books, Time Magazine, Paris Match, The Economist, New Yorker. I was overwhelmed by the glamour and gravitas of these periodicals: the smell and weight of the paper stock, the photo-journalism and, above all, the quality of the writing and editing. (more…)

Categories: 5-HTP · Food for the brain · Holford · omega 3 · patrick holford · supplements
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Equazen and the ASA - Again

October 15, 2008 · 13 Comments

Zombie Fish

Visiting Professor Patrick Holford is Head of Science and Education at Biocare and has an unerring sense for his endorsements (see, e.g., the qLink with the unconnected coil and the dLan that may enhance your exposure to EMR and YorkTest, source of the IgG food intolerance tests criticised by both the House of Lords and the ASA). Holford managed to procure some useful backing for the Food for the Brain project. One of the companies is Equazen. Equazen donated essential fat supplements to school projects. With an astonishing sense of inevitability, although the ASA criticised Equazen in 2007 for being unable to substantiate some of its advertising claims, it has just issued an adjudication against more unjustified claims by Equazen, this time for indirectly implying that fish oils are a treatment for ADHD. (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · children · patrick holford · supplements
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Durham Fish Oil Zombie Rises Again

September 25, 2008 · 15 Comments

Zombie Fish

Dr Ben Goldacre of badscience.net has posted a summary of the Durham Fish Oil Trials Initiative and the latest update to the saga in which Durham Council has released the data showing spectacularly successful outcomes. Except, it hasn’t. Enquiring minds want to know if the data are being held over to be released with a fanfare at the Food for the Brain conference and the session where Dr Madeleine Portwood is scheduled to announce the outcome of the trials initiative. (more…)

Categories: Ben Goldacre · Food for the brain · children
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

Post #350: “If you think I have been overly critical, I would invite you to notice that they win”

September 21, 2008 · 19 Comments

This is our 350th post on HolfordWatch. Over the course of these posts, we have found a number of inaccuracies in Holford’s self-presentation and many serious errors in his work. These errors overwhelmingly remain uncorrected or inadequately corrected, and Holford has failed to respond to almost all of the issues raised (what responses we have had from Holford are not at all convincing). However, we would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Patrick Holford: despite embarrassingly poor-quality work, an inaccurate CV and very public demolitions of his research, Patrick Holford has achieved a great deal in his career, in academia and in the media.

While we have been running this blog, Holford managed to sell his Health Products for Life business to Biocare (owned by Neutrahealth, who 30% owned by Elder Pharmaceuticals) for £464,000, and currently works as Head of Science and Education at Biocare. We have ethical quibbles about taking money from the pharmaceutical industry - we don’t do it - but careers in this industry are competitive, and Holford should be congratulated for getting so much money from Biocare (and thus, indirectly, from Elder Pharmaceuticals).

Holford should also be congratulated for having his application to be a visiting professor at Teesside University approved (more…)

Categories: Ben Goldacre · Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · University of Teesside · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , ,

FOIA reply: it’s a good job that Teesside University didn’t offer Holford a visiting professorship for financial reasons…

July 30, 2008 · 6 Comments

…because, if they did, they would be feeling pretty silly now.

We have recently received a response to a FOIA request to Teesside University, which included some interesting information about Visiting Professor Patrick Holford’s time at the University. Teesside’s Case for Patrick Holford as a Visiting Professor [PDF] referred to Food for the Brain funding a £12,500/year PhD bursary - something that would have cost a good £37,500. However, when Teesside were asked about any Holford-related income, they responded that:

No income has been received by the University from Mr Holford, Biocare, the Brain Bio Centre or Food for the Brain. Expenses have been paid by Food for the Brain for attendance by University staff in connection with a Schools project.

The total amount of money coming into Teesside from all these sources was therefore…wait for it… (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · University of Teesside · patrick holford
Tagged: , , ,

CAM Magazine reports on Holford’s resignation from Teesside and on “hard-core science bloggers”

July 8, 2008 · 16 Comments

CAM Magazine has - to their credit - run a news item covering Patrick Holford’s resignation of his visiting professorship at Teesside University. In the July edition, CAM Magazine reports that “Holford’s appointment outraged hard-core science bloggers who stirred up an ongoing Internet ‘inquiry’ into both his qualifications and Teesside’s motives.” (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Holford · University of Teesside · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , ,

My (Paid) Friend Says This Product Is Really Good: FFTB and Cherry-Picking

May 2, 2008 · 10 Comments

Visiting Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University and the Food for the Brain Foundation (FFTB) are promoting a very well-thought plan whereby food and supplement manufacturers will give them money in exchange for the endorsement of their products. Now, charities have to get their money from somewhere, so isn’t that all very sensible? (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Food for the brain foundation · Holford · University of Teesside · children · patrick holford
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Patrick Holford Responds to Radio 4 Programme and Misses the Point: Part 2a

April 2, 2008 · 1 Comment

Back in January we wrote to Professor Patrick Holford of Teesside University, Head of Science and Education at Biocare and CEO of Food for the Brain: we asked some questions about the survey to help us perform a robust review. We waited for three weeks but did not receive any responses and, thus hampered, continued to review the survey and uncovered about as grisly a work of ineptitude with statistics as has ever come our way.

The FFTB Child Survey literature review was irrelevant and incompetent. But the number-crunching and display of summary data were breathtakingly, unbelievably bad. Office-neighbours-should-have-been-pounding-on-the-wall-and-calling-the-statistics-authorities-and-reporting-a-hazard-to-health bad. The-guilty-parties-should-be-having-their-keyboard-privileges-revoked bad. (more…)

Categories: Food for the brain · Holford · University of Teesside · children · omega 3 · patrick holford · referenciness · scienciness · supplements
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,