Tag Archives: Durham Fish Oil Initiative

Madeleine Portwood, fish oil, chemistry and children

Madeleine Portwood discusses fish oil research, saying “this is not about chemistry. This is about children”. We say this is about chemistry *and* children. Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under dyspraxia, fish, omega 3

Durham choosing how to measure success in their fish oil (non)trial: third time lucky?

Looking over the Durham fish oil (non)trial again, I noticed something I had missed: they have previously claimed to be looking at three quite different things in order to determine whether the pills are effective. They started out (back in … Continue reading

9 Comments

Filed under fish, supplements

Durham fish oil (non)trial and science by press release: it’s unclear what the children were taking

In their continued efforts to provide a textbook example of why science by press release is a very bad thing, Durham Council’s press releases about their fish oil (non)trial even manage to muddy the water as to which Essential Fatty … Continue reading

8 Comments

Filed under Equazen, fish, omega 3, supplements

Durham fish oil (non)trial: confusing numbers, and the dangers of science by press release

If I didn’t know better, I might suspect that Durham’s fish oil trial initiative has been designed as an example of the dangers of releasing scientific results via the mainstream media. I have been looking over the Durham figures, and … Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under fat, fish

The Durham Fish Oil Zombie Rises Again

Durham Council has released the data from its Fish Oil Initiative for schools. Only kidding. They say that they have but they haven’t really. It’s all so self-referentially post-modern. The trial that was called a trial was really an initiative. The results that they have released aren’t results. Continue reading

15 Comments

Filed under Ben Goldacre, children, Food for the brain