Tag Archives: Science So What? So Everything
Science: So What? Bad nutrition on garlic and cancer
Science: So What? So Everything offers a poor account of the evidence on garlic and cancer. Continue reading
Filed under Science: So What?
Bad nutrition from Science: So What?
Bad nutrition from Science: So What? So Everything: they go beyond the evidence when discussing turmeric, ginger and cancer Continue reading
Filed under curcumin, Science: So What?, turmeric
BIS and Science: So What’s definition of “rigorous and credible” research
BIS and Science: So What? So Everything promote bad research in the name of science communication: insisting that this bad research is “rigorous and credible”. Continue reading
Filed under Science: So What?
Science So What? So disappointing
Concerns about Science So What website: poor accessibility, some poor quality content, and poor use of social media. Continue reading
Filed under science degrees, Science: So What?
Science So What roundtable – join in the discussion
Roundtable on the Science: So What? campaign. Post your comments and help make things better. Continue reading
Filed under patrick holford
Science So What? So Everything: web stats
Following some discussion of the Science So What? campaign, they have helpfully e-mailed us their web stats – in response to a question that we raised. The stats for the campaign from its 27th January start through to 20th May … Continue reading
Filed under patrick holford
Science So What? So Everything: FOIA response
Science So What? So Everything respond to our FOIA request. They make some interesting – but problematic – points. Continue reading
Filed under patrick holford
Science So What? So Everything. Freedom of Information request and blog comment
We have previously posted some criticisms of aspects of the Science So What? So Everything? campaign. Elliot from the campaign has now responded to our guest post on Science: So What and science communication. We are grateful to him for … Continue reading
Filed under patrick holford
