Tag Archives: Tim Hancock

by jonhw | January 25, 2010

BIS and Science: So What’s definition of “rigorous and credible” research

BIS and Science: So What? So Everything promote bad research in the name of science communication: insisting that this bad research is “rigorous and credible”. Continue reading →

1 Comment

Filed under Science: So What?

Tagged as BIS, Business Innovation and Skills, Department for Business Innovation and Skills, Fast Future, Rohit Talwar, Science So What? So Everything, Tim Hancock

Recent Posts

Pages
Search for:
Mini-Blog
Bad Science Blogs
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Archives
BadScience Blogroll
Evidence-Based Medicine
Non-BadScience Blogs and Links
Disclaimer

At the risk of sounding like Arthur Weasley, information on this blog is not intended as a substitute for advice from a qualified medical practitioner. If you have health concerns, see a Dr or dietician (a blog is not the place to diagnose a health problem).
Anti-Quackery
Ring
Ring Hub
Random
[<< Prev | Next >>]
Technorati Profile for HolfordWatch
Spam Blocked

310,566 spam comments blocked by
Akismet
February 2012

M T W T F S S

« Oct

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

27 28 29
Meta

	Patrick Holford, Yor… on Patrick Holford Trails His Jul…
	Patrick Holford, Yor… on Myth: You Can Diagnose Food In…
	Patrick Holford, Yor… on Holford benefit[s] – modestly …
	Patrick Holford, Yor… on Patrick Holford is an ex-Profe…
	Martin MacDonald on Off-Topic

Tag Archives: Tim Hancock

BIS and Science: So What’s definition of “rigorous and credible” research

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Pages

Mini-Blog

Bad Science Blogs

Archives

BadScience Blogroll

Evidence-Based Medicine

Non-BadScience Blogs and Links

Disclaimer

Spam Blocked

Meta

Follow “Holford Watch: Patrick Holford, nutritionism and bad science”

February 2012
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Oct
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29